This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Changes by 217.138.66.137 on 10 October 2016 - POV-pushing?edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The IP 217.138.66.137 made drastical changes to the "conclusion" section, deleting a lot of information, replacing it with just one sentence based on a single book by Jeff Lipkes (that apparently supports the IP's POV). 2003:84:AD2C:6284:D8BE:E501:1BA7:6F55 (talk) 22:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
.svg)
