Talk:Committee of 300

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 81.37.57.210 in topic Comments

Comments edit

Before my edits get reverted back to "theory". Nothing about this group is theory. While it may not be an incorporated organization of people enough verifiable references exist to prove it's not a theory.

If anything it's a label given to this group of people.Woods01 (talk) 19:26, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Not really. All I can find is the old Walter Rathenau quote and an author saying that some one told him that a group called the Olympians that were the Council of 300. Not enough.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 23:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dr. John Coleman held a speech concerning documents handed to him while he was serving in Africa. They were "Eyes only" documents which referred to a group he found himself covertly working for. He though he was there stopping the spread of communism, but the documents revealed he was in the employment of The Committee of 300, also known as The Olympians. His book, The Conspirators Hierarchy: The Committee of 300 is the basis for his talk available at the link below. The book is freely available also in a link below.

Book: https://odysee.com/@QuantumRhinoBooks:3/The-Conspirators-Hierarchy-The-Committee-of-300-by-John-Coleman:a Presentation: https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/the-committee-of-300-explosive-lecture-dr-john-coleman/2A00:23C7:5981:A01:8554:86C2:233E:D090 (talk) 21:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why is this book not mentioned and referenced in the article and why does John Coleman himself not also have an article? 81.37.57.210 (talk) 22:38, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Vagueness edit

this is all extremely vague. The original authors need to elaborate and clarify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.112.140.90 (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Is the CIA a reputable source? edit

https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/4A/4A92FD2FB4DAE3F773DB0B7742CF0F65_Coleman.-.CONSPIRATORS.HIERARCHY.-.THE.STORY.OF.THE.COMMITTEE.OF.300.R.pdf

Indeed the fact that wikipedia labels this a theory shows what a joke it has become. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.154.119.109 (talk) 11:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Family Guy Guy (talk) 18:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

No it is not. 95.42.26.40 (talk) 12:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply