This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled edit
Please add few more paragraphs, and at least a picture shall be a fine addition. --Bhadani 14:21, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Let us upgrade edit
For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 10:26, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Holy moly outdated! edit
This is a very, very bad/inaccurate/poorly sourced/amateur/outdated article from the point of view of a modern urban planner. I will try and edit it if I have time, but I am very busy and just wanted others to know it's outdated and borderline against modern planning practice. I don't think there's a Wikipedia "tag" thing for that... For starters, compare this article to the one for mixed-use development. Also: Where did the 5% thing come from?? And why is that the first sentence?? "This type of property falls somewhere between residential and industrial property." What does that mean??? Ridiculous. Oh man, this article needs attention. Wow. Again, I'll try myself if I have time, but just wanted to make it known! Torvik (talk) 23:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
English to utdu edit
Yes 103.153.15.93 (talk) 18:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Merge proposal edit
There's a January proposal to merge the synonymous term Commercial district to here; it sounds like a good idea to consolidate these two weakly-sourced articles into something better (at at least, more complete). Klbrain (talk) 16:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)