Talk:Commemoration of the American Civil War

who wrote this?

[copy ex talk:Am Civil War] Hello, I represent a history class at the University of South Florida. We added a great deal of information about the Civil War Sesquicentennial that we hope you all appreciate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apirok1188 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

thanks for all the good work and fresh ideas! The additions are so important that they now form a separate article, which has now been expanded some. See Commemoration of the American Civil War Rjensen (talk) 12:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

High praise indeed when given by RJensen! I echo his sentiments. And moving was a great idea, as well. Student7 (talk) 22:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Centennial

Note that the battles that favored one side or the other, were promoted as battlefield memorials. For example, Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield was a "tactical" Confederate victory, located in Georgia. It was dedicated in 1966. Contrast that with Salisbury National Cemetery, North Carolina. While it has been a national cemetery for a long time, it didn't make the National Register of Historical Monuments until 1999, despite being the largest prison in the South. It is not promoted locally, and can be found, with some difficulty, by following National Park signs and information from guidebooks. While the South could not really have done anything about it at the time (like Andersonville), a lot of the prisoners were starved to death at the end of the war. Understandably, the residents are not exactly proud of this monument. Around 1864-5, the locals were vying with their own soldiers for food destined for the prisoners. Student7 (talk) 22:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Appleman-Jude award

The article mentions an award local to the National Park Service which several superintendents received. The problem is that this is only local. Not like you and I could win it! Sort of like setting up a Wikipedia Civil War article award and voting one of our numbers as having won it. I mean, somebody local has to win it. Kind of like "Employee of the Month." Not really notable outside the NPS, and therefore should probably be removed from the article. Student7 (talk) 22:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

The National Park Service is a very large organization with many top professionals. Its awards represent genuine achievement and should be included, in my opinion. Rjensen (talk) 00:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia has entire articles on medals and awards that are only available to soldiers, sailors, etc. We don't claim that these aren't notable outside the military.47.139.41.66 (talk) 21:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

stamps

there is an article in progress on the stamps of the war; it should be connected here. see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Civil War history on stamps Rjensen (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Citations in history articles: Please include author, title and year

Citations in history articles like this one require at the minimum the author, the title, & the year. That is taught every college freshman class and is in all the standard guidebooks. With that information, the student or the librarian can actually find a book or a scholarly article. More than that, It is important for the reader to know who said what -- names, titles, and dates are intrinsically important. A statement written in 2014 has a different weight than one written in 1914. Furthermore, Wikipedia recommends against bare URLs Wikipedia:Bare URLs because of Link rot. If URL is changed five years from now, it will be a mystery to readers unless they know how to go through year after year of edit history to find the original source With author, title and year. Rjensen (talk) 18:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Cleanup of refs with bare links

Head's up. I'm in the process of cleaning these up. I'll do more later. Note that for now, I'm only applying links to titles to improve aesthetics, not doing full re-writes of the refs. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 20:45, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Commemoration of the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140328142814/http://www.battleofolustee.org:80/forms_docs/2014_schedule.html to http://battleofolustee.org/forms_docs/2014_schedule.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Commemoration of the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151118001019/http://www.illinoiscivilwar150.org:80/index.html to http://www.illinoiscivilwar150.org/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150227202930/http://www.eveningsun.com/gettysburg150/ci_23368770/two-re-enactments-give-gettysburg-150th-new-skirmish to http://www.eveningsun.com/gettysburg150/ci_23368770/two-re-enactments-give-gettysburg-150th-new-skirmish
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131212090907/http://lancasteronline.com/blogs/civilwar/2012/09/14/antietam-battle-so-big-there-are-2-re-enactments/ to http://lancasteronline.com/blogs/civilwar/2012/09/14/antietam-battle-so-big-there-are-2-re-enactments
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nps.gov/cwindepth/civilwar150-states.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://libraryschool.libguidescms.com/middleschoolcivilwar%20

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Use of present or future tense to refer to events 5-10 years ago

Someone please go through the article and update things like the following:

"When the Interior Appropriations bill for FY 2010 is passed later this week"

"Titled "The Address," this documentary is set to be released in April 2014."

It's now 2019.

I'm pretty sure than the bill FY 2010 passed already.

And maybe the documentary is set to be released in the future or it was released in 2014 -- but it can't still be set to be released in 2014.

47.139.41.66 (talk) 21:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

You can fix it yourself. Giving other people chores doesn't tend to work very well.deisenbe (talk) 23:54, 20 July 2019 (UTC)