Talk:Commemoration of Stepan Bandera

Biased warning about unsourced article

There appears to be ample sources and notes for this article, so there doesn't appear to be any reason for the warning template at the top of the article other than perhaps a politically biased attempt to censor or question the authenticity of the text. Silvanus93 (talk) 07:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

I know he's a contentious fascist, but I'm trying to figure out which side would benefit from having fewer sources. Wikipedia is built on reliable sources. Every article is subject to that standard. In a list like this especially, it would be ideal to have at least one source that confirms the existence of each monument. Jyamine (talk) 15:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

I've added sources for all but two monuments. Some of them can be easily found via Google maps, too, just need to use the Ukrainian city name + the Ukrainian word for monument (~пам'ятник) + the name Bandera in Cyrillic. Nakonana (talk) 20:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Change article name

I suggest the name of this article be changed to Commemoration of Stepan Bandera, a more general name in line with other articles. -- Jabbi (talk) 23:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

For background this is based on this discussion: Talk:Stepan Bandera#Splitting proposal, and is so that things like street signs etc. can be included on the list Tristario (talk) 01:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Even if we don't change the name I don't think it would be much of a stretch to include content about things like street signs in this article Tristario (talk) 09:21, 13 March 2023 (UTC)