Talk:Commelinaceae

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Sarvere010 in topic Evaluation and Suggestions

How come Aclisia isn't listed here? Is it not given generic rank under APG II? Hesperian 05:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's a synonym of Pollia :-) DJLayton4 (talk)

Pollia links to the Gastropod of the same name. Disambiguity page neccessary ? Wosch61 (talk) 12:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Done. Ratzd'mishukribo (talk) 18:26, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Evaluation and Suggestions edit

I have a couple comments and suggestions about this article that could be beneficial. Many of the facts stated in this article do not have references clearly noted after the statement. The second paragraph is an example of this; there are no references included in this paragraph to explain where any of the mentioned facts about the Commelinaceae group come from. I feel that adding the references to this paragraph and some of other facts throughout the article could improve the quality of the article. I also noticed that a few of the references used do not have a link to the actual article or source being used; adding these links in could help a reader verify the facts being stated in this article. That being said, overall, this article is useful, with a collection of information on the subject. Thanks! --Sarvere010 (talk) 18:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply


External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Commelinaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:27, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply