Talk:Combinatorial participatory budgeting
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Closed Limelike Curves in topic Move to "Participatory budgeting voting rule"?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Move to "Participatory budgeting voting rule"?
editThis article is mostly about methods that decide what output knapsack to select. It is not about algorithmic questions like how to most quickly compute a particular outcome. So I think a title involving "voting rule" or "voting system" would be more descriptive. A more practical reason to rename the article is that "algorithm" sounds a bit scary, and voting topics should be as accessible as possible to members of the public. @Erel Segal, any views on this? DominikPeters (talk) 14:26, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Dominink. I agree about algorithm being too technical; for brevity, I suggest "participatory budgeting rule". --Erel Segal (talk) 18:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Agree with a move to "Participatory budgeting rule". "Combinatorial participatory budgeting" makes me think of combinatorial auctions (assigning value to bundles of spending programs instead of individual programs). Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 00:44, 14 August 2024 (UTC)