Talk:Columbia River Basalt Group

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2021 and 11 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sedith7. Peer reviewers: Ajmaclaurin, Laurenmacky.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Comprises edit

In a recent edit summary: "someone reversed "is comprised of" to "comprises" (which completely changes the meaning)" so simplified wording to "is made up of"

"Comprises" means "is made up of" or "is composed of". "Is comprised of" is flagged as informal or incorrect by many dictionaries. See also wikt:comprise. The "is made up of" wording is fine too though, so no need to change it. -- JHunterJ 20:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

better map to upload edit

also from USGS: http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/LivingWith/Historical/LewisClark/Maps/map_columbia_river_flood_basalts.html -Pete (talk) 05:22, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, time to work on a better map for the introduction. The existing one (also seen below) is not out and out bad – it does show the areal extent of the CRB in the regional context, and is not a bad graphic per se – but it is cluttered with other details not relevant to this article. Also, it would be nice if we could get a similar map that shows the individual units.

  • The image at vulcan.wr.usgs.gov is comparable, but the additional text in the image won't work well in the reduced size needed for the lede.
  • Camp and Ross have some very nice images in their "Radiating Volcanic Migrations" article at MantlePlumes.org. (And we are arranging permission to use these.) I think fig. 2 would work, though some of the text is not as clear as I would like, and the individual units are not shown.
Update: see File:CRBG_distribution_RVM-2.jpg and File:CRBG_distribution_RVM-5.jpg.
Ooops, had to retract those. Better images coming. 23:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Camp and Hanan's fig. 5b at [1] is also a likely candidate, esp. as it has the individual units. The drawback is that the shaded-relief background darkens and obscures the image. If someone wanted grab a copy of that and see if the background could be lightened it would be strong candidate.
  • There are some good images in PNNL 15221 (where the existing image came from). Fig. 3 (p. 2.3) is esp. good as a graphic, but unfortunately it is illustrating structural features of part of the CRB. Fig. 6b shows individual flows, but again there is a problem with the black background, and small labels. However, I suspect ImageMagick might be able to reduce the background to a nice gray. Perhaps even replace the labels.

There are a few other images (and in multiple versions) out there, but I think none as good as these. Anyone think any of these, or a possibly reworked version, might be an improvement over the existing image? ~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 21:55, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have just forwarded the permissions, so we should be good to go with these wonderful images:

File:Columbia_River_Flood-Basalt_Province.jpg
File:CRB-Yellowstone_mantle_plume_model.jpg
~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 00:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Very cool!! Thanks for working on this, JJ! The maps look great. -Pete (talk) 01:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Steens flow edit

The scientific opinion seems to moving towards the Steens flow being the initial ("oldest") event. Any opinions re updating the article to reflect that? - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 18:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Agree. Made a minor chage based on Camp reference, but the whole dating issue needs to be unraveled. Will chat with Steve Reidel at WSU to to determine what he recommends for references.
Thanks for spotting this out of date information - Williamborg (Bill) 20:55, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yes, Steve is one of the best people to ask (and I am impressed that you know him). I wonder if he would have any suggestions regarding the article as a whole? - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 22:11, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Not so hard to ask - i'm taking Steve's intro Geology course this term - he seems eminently approachable. And yes, i'm sure he'll have some useful comments on the article - but before asking him to review it, i'm inclined to clean up some of the obviously outdated material. As you pointed out with your comment on Steens, the literature has evolved quite a bit since this article started back on 2006 - and it appears Steens and CRBG are now considered different parts of the same large igneous province. I pulled a bunch of articles today and will try to incorporate some of the more recent material. And update the dates - which are now internally contradictory. I'd appreciate your critiques as this evolves over the next few weeks. Skål - Williamborg (Bill) 06:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Before asking him to review the article, see if he'd suggest what major points ought to be covered. Also, I would suggest converting the article to Harv templates, with which I would be happy to assist. And let me know if need any help finding articles. - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 16:55, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

<==
Good idea. Will ask Steve about his view of the major points.

Know that there has been a debate whether Harvard ref (HR) should be the preferred usage, which has gone on unresolved on Wikipedia forever. Myself, i don't have that strong an opinion. Mostly i think references should be used, irrespective of the formatn. However, i can see at least one advantage of HR - it is easier to add material from a reference without having to search for the first use. But the alternative notation works easily enough too. Regardless, if you want to convert the article to Harvard notation, feel free. It will be an interesting exercise for me to adjust.

Skål - Williamborg (Bill) 01:59, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Okay! It is a lot easier to manage references (and citations) with {{Harv}}. I am also a strong advocate of pulling bibliographic detail out of the text (which makes both the text and the bibliogrpahic detail easier to read and edit) and putting it into a separate References section (which makes it easier to check and groom the references). Also, "named refs" are not congenial for specific citation (e.g., page numbers and such). Fortunately, this article is still small enough that it won't be difficult to convert. I'll try to get to it sooner than later. - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 19:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yikes! You're running well ahead of me!
Several details to sort out. First, I would urge use of {{citation}} templates rather than the {{cite xxx}} family. Second, I find vertical formating of the templates to be much clearer than stringing everything together horizontally (and am going to do that unless you have a strong objection). Third, do you prefer to go with full names? or last names and initials? I have previously tended toward initials, but am feeling more inclined towards full names (when available). There is also a view of going with the style of the original journal. - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 21:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Just a little nagging reminder: are you okay using {{citation}} templates rather than the {{cite xxx}} templates? - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 21:23, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thoughts on article upgrade edit

Following up on J. Johnson's thoughts with a first order summary of what might be done. Feel free to supplement or revise this list:

1- The evolving understanding including Steens, Picture Gorge et al. edit

Tie in Steens, Picture Gorge & other coeval basalt flows (using literature) -

  • Update map to show flow overlap into Nevada, California & Idaho
     
    example map update
  • include Yellowstone hotspot discussion
  • Incorporate dike/dyke maps
  • Camp & Ross discuss, "The Oregon High Lava Plains represents is a complementary system of propagating rhyolite eruptions contemporaneous with the Snake River Plain propagation since �10 Ma, but in an opposite direction." Incorporate...
  • Include timeline showing flows in sequence
  • Tie in with Picture Gorge Basalt flows & Fort Rock - Heiken, G. H. (1981). "Geological Survey Circular 838 - Guides to Some Volcanic Terrances in Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and Northern California - A Field Trip to The Maar Volcanoes of the Fort Rock - Christmas Lake Valley Basin, Oregon". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2011-08-28. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

2 - Stratigraphy edit

Sort out the Ma sequence to the most recent dating/thinking

3 - LIP Context edit

Put into context as a large igneous province

  • Address the controversy about creation
  • Compare to and contrast with comparable traps (e.g., Deccan and Siberian)

4 - Columbia Gorge & west edit

Tie in with the Columbia Gorge

5 - Sources edit

Possible references and resources:

A trailing "" indicates that a search for a readily accessible copy (such as a pdf) was negative.

A B edit

  • Adams, David C.; Humphreys, Eugene D. (2010), "New constraints on the properties of the Yellowstone mantle plume from P and S wave attenuation tomography", Journal of Geophysical Research, 115 (B12311): 1–18, doi:10.1029/2009JB006864, ISSN 0148-0227
  • Baksi, Ajoy K. (2004), "Ages of the Steens and Columbia River flood basalts and their relationship to extension related calc-alkalic volcanism in eastern Oregon: Discussion", GSA Bulletin, 116: 247–226, doi:10.1130/B25310.1
See also Baksi, 2006, Discussion
  • Baksi, Ajoy K. (2010), "Comment to "Distribution and geochronology of the Oregon Plateau (U.S.A.) flood basalt volcanism: The Steens Basalt Revisited" by M.E. Brueseke et al.", Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 196: 134–138, doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2010.04.007
  • Bjornstad, Bruce N.; Babcok, R. Scott; Last, George V. (2007), "Flood basalts and Ice Age floods: Repeated late Cenozoic cataclysms of southeastern Washington", in Stelling, Peter L.; Tucker, David S. (eds.), GSA Field Guide 9: Floods, Faults, and Fire: Geological Field Trips in Washington State and Southwest British Columbia, pp. 209–255, doi:10.1130/2007.fld009(10), ISBN 978-0-8137-0009-0
  • Bondre, Ninad R.; Hart, William K. (2008), "Morphological and textural diversity of the Steens Basalt lava flows, Southeastern Oregon, USA: implications for emplacement style and nature of eruptive episode", Bulletin of Volcanology, 70 (8): 999–1019, doi:10.1007/s00445-007-0182-x, ISSN 0258-8900
  • Brown, Kyle B.; McIntosh, Jennifer C.; Baker, Victor R. (2010), "Isotopically‐depleted late Pleistocene groundwater in Columbia River Basalt aquifers: Evidence for recharge of glacial Lake Missoula floodwaters?", Geophysical Research Letters, 37 (L21402), doi:10.1029/2010GL044992, 2010 {{citation}}: |first4= missing |last4= (help); Check |doi= value (help); Missing pipe in: |first4= (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

C - E edit

  • Coe, Robert S.; Stock, Greg M.; Lyons, John J.; Beitler, Brenda; Bowen, Gabriel J. (2005), "Yellowstone hotspot volcanism in California? A paleomagnetic test of the Lovejoy flood basalt hypothesis", Geology, 33 (9): 697–700, doi:10.1130/G21733.1, ISSN 0091-7613
  • Dodson, Allen; Kennedy, B. Mack; DePaolo, Donald J. (1997), "Helium and neon isotopes in the Imnaha Basalt, Columbia River Basalt Group: Evidence for a Yellowstone plume source", Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 50 (3–4): 443–451
  • Durand, Sedelia Rodriguez; Sen, Gautum (2004), "Preeruption history of the Grande Ronde Formation lavas, Columbia River Basalt Group, American Northwest: Evidence from phenocrysts", Geology, 32 (4): 293–296, doi:10.1130/G20109.1

F - H edit

 
Picture Gorge Basalt photo
 
Picture Gorge Basalt photo
  • Hartley, M. E.; Thordarson, T. (2009), "Melt segregations in a Columbia River Basalt lava flow: A possible mechanism for the formation of highly evolved mafic magmas", Lithos, 112 (3–4): 434–446, doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2009.04.003
A document was found, but haven't figured out the url.
  • Hooper, P. R.; Conrey, R. M. (1989), "A model for the tectonic setting of the Columbia River basalt eruptions", in Reidel, S. P.; Hooper, P. R. (eds.), Volcanism and Tectonicism in the Columbia River Flood-Basalts Province, vol. Special Paper 239, Geological Society of America, pp. 293–306

I-J edit

  • Jarboe, Nicholas A.; Coe, Robert; Glen, Jonathan M.G. (2011), "Evidence from lava flows for complex polarity transitions: the new composite Steens Mountain reversal record", Geophysical Journal International, 186 (2): 580–602, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05086.x
  • Jarboe, N. A.; Coe, R. S.; Renne, P. R.; Glen, J. M. G.; Mankinen, E. A. (2008), "Quickly erupted volcanic sections of the Steens Basalt, Columbia River Basalt Group: Secular variation, tectonic rotation, and the Steens Mountain reversal", Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 9 (Q11010), doi:10.1029/2008GC002067

K - R edit

  • Peterson, Curt D.; Minor, Rick; Peterson, Gary L.; Gates, Edward B. (2011), "Pre-and post-Missoula flood geomorphology of the Pre-Holocene ancestral Columbia River Valley in the Portland forearc basin, Oregon and Washington, USA", Geomorphology, 129 (3–4): 276–293, doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.02.022
  • Reidel, Stephen (2006), "Comment on Philpotts and Philpotts (2005): Crystal-mush compaction in the Cohassett flood-basalt flow, Hanford, Washington", Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 152 (1–2): 189–193, doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2005.11.001

S-Z edit

  • Walker, George P.L.; Cañón-Tapia, Edgardo; Herrero-Bervera, Emilio (1999), "Origin of vesicle layering and double imbrication by endogenous growth in the Birkett basalt flow �Columbia river plateau", Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 88 (1–2): 15–28, doi:10.1016/S0377-0273(98)00112-7, ISSN 0377-0273 {{citation}}: replacement character in |title= at position 99 (help)

Unfiled edit

  • Egger, Anne E. and Elizabeth L. Miller; Evolution of the northwestern margin of the Basin and Range: The geology and extensional history of the Warner Range and environs, northeastern California; Geosphere, June 1, 2011, v. 7, no. 3, p. 756-773
  • Camp, V. E.; Hanan, B. B. (June 2008), "A plume-triggered delamination origin for the Columbia River Basalt Group" (PDF), Geosphere, 4 (3): 480–495, doi:10.1130/GES00175.1
  • Lerch, Derek William, Elizabeth Miller, Michael McWilliams and Joseph Colgan; Tectonic and magmatic evolution of the northwestern Basin and Range and its transition to unextended volcanic plateaus: Black Rock Range, Nevada; Geological Society of America Bulletin, March 1, 2008, v. 120, no. 3-4, p. 300-311
  • Kamenov, George D., James A. Saunders, Willis E. Hames and Derick L. Unger; MAFIC MAGMAS AS SOURCES FOR GOLD IN MIDDLE MIOCENE EPITHERMAL DEPOSITS OF THE NORTHERN GREAT BASIN, UNITED STATES: EVIDENCE FROM Pb ISOTOPE COMPOSITIONS OF NATIVE GOLD; Economic Geology, November 1, 2007, v. 102, no. 7, p. 1191-1195

6 - Good Article Criteria edit

Review against good article criteria

Other comments appreciated - Williamborg (Bill) 15:17, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notes & comments edit

I think there should be more connections to the broader context. E.g., the Yellowstone hotspot (a large, related topic, though the article is deplorable) and other Large igneous provinces, perhaps the Deccan and Siberian Traps specifically. These flows are also central to the scenic attraction of the Columbia Gorge (which has a deplorable Geology section)), and various outcrops on the Oregon coast (which a large population would find of interest). Ah, so much to do! - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Incorporated your thoughts into the above list, which i'll use as a check list... Williamborg (Bill) 23:55, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Agree there are better maps. The problem is finding one that is prepared with USG funds or is otherwise in the public domain. Like your suggested map, but would need to find it or recreate it...
It can be a bit of a hassle, but many scientists are willing to contribute their images. I suspect Vic Camp would be willing if he was asked nicely. (It is so gratifying to have images even better than what the journal published. And the small hassle can be deemed character building.) - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 20:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Under LIP I see you struck out "address controversy about creation". Check with Steve about this, but I believe that here it's not so much a "controversy about creation" as a "question about origin". This is where matters get tied into the YSH, which is controversial, and so probably warrants some addressing. Check out The Columbia River Basalts & Yellowstone Hot Spot: A Mantle Plume?, as well as Camp & Ross (above). - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 23:25, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Actually used strikeout only to indicate I've attempted to incorporate it into the article. Quite a bit of work to be done though... thanks for the further recommendations - still quite a ways to go - Williamborg (Bill) 01:15, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ah, as in "done". You might find {{done-t}}, or even {{working}}, useful. - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 18:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Small articles that have a single main source may still be adequately referenced without the use of inline citations. Inline citations may not be required for some articles; the criteria name the only six types of material that require inline citations.
  2. ^ Articles on controversial topics can be both neutral and stable, but this is only ensured if regular editors make scrupulous efforts to keep the article well-referenced. Note that neutrality does not mean that all points of view are covered equally: instead no point of view should be given undue weight.

Work area edit

Contents moved to References section in article. - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 00:12, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

References; Harv; pages needed. edit

Notable changes: I have moved the reflist to a new Notes section, populated References with the corrected, augmented, and templated forms of the references previously buried in the main text, replaced all the "named refs" (and merged where appropriate) with a {{Harv}} citation, and checked the links to the references.

I have scattered a few [page needed] inline tags throughout (as well as leaving in empty "p. ") to highlight that WP:page numbers are needed. (A major failing of relying on individual "named refs" -- specific citation is difficult, so tends to be left off.) Other problems noted in the text. ("That should hold the .....s". :-0 ) - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 00:09, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

comparison to Central Atlantic Magmatic Province ?? edit

Before 200Ma, a spreading ridge running east-west through the length of the ancient Tethys ocean gradually opened up that seaway. About 200Ma, the western end of that Mid-Ocean Ridge (MOR) reached, and ran under, the supercontinent of Pangea, between Africa (to the south) and North America (to the north), as indicated in the following figures:

http://imageshack.us/a/img29/4546/insularislands400200mya.png
http://imageshack.us/a/img441/3249/insularislands20050mya.png

Now, about 50Ma, the west coast of North America obducted over another MOR (the east Pacific rise). The spreading ridge underneath the continental crust caused crustal thinning, and minor rifting, generating the Basin and Range province, as well as the Yellowstone hotspot and Columbia River Basalt Group. Thus, the CAMP resembles those continental rift zones, except running perpendicular to the coast (instead of parallel to), and on a larger scale, which successfully rifted Africa from North America. Perhaps rifting is facilitated, by perpendicular incidence, of the spreading zone??

More speculatively, about 95Ma, the Tethys MOR may have been subducted under Eurasia, pulling India, then Africa, northwards towards Eurasia. About that time, northern Africa was flooded, leading to the extinction of large northern African dinosaurs & reptiles, like Spinosaurus, Carcharodontosaurus, Paralititan, Sarcosuchus (according to the BBC documentary Planet Dinosaur). Perhaps a change, from compressive force coming southwards from a MOR into northern African continental crust, before 95Ma; to an extensional force pulling northwards to a Subduction Zone (SZ) before Eurasia; caused the northern African crust to stop thickening, and start thinning, depressing the surface below Tethys-sea level?? 66.235.38.214 (talk) 12:49, 17 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, all that is very interesting stuff. Do you have a specific question or suggestion regarding this article? ~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 23:14, 17 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps people in the field are familiar with scholarly & citable sources? Legitimate geologic connections would benefit the article. 66.235.38.214 (talk) 07:29, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
I am generally in favor of showing contexts and broad connections. "Perhaps" you think this article needs more that? Fine. Can you make a specific suggestion? ~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 18:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Columbia River Basalt Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply