Talk:Colton Parayko

Latest comment: 3 years ago by HickoryOughtShirt?4 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Colton Parayko/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 20:38, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures edit

  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Links edit

Prose edit

Lede edit

General edit

  • Link motorcross. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    •   Done
  • Midget AAA - what is this? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    •   Done
  • St. Albert Crusaders U18 AA of the Rural & Edmonton Midget 15AA Hockey League - this seems a bit confusing to me. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • The Rural & Edmonton Midget 15AA Hockey League is the league they played in but I have removed it.
  • Is there a link for points, isn't it goals in hockey? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    •   Done Goals are a type of point but not all points are goals. I have WL Point (ice hockey)
  • try-outs not try out. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    •   Done
  • link defenceman Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    •   Done
  • Link what a "shift" is. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    •   Done
  • The bit about him getting scouted could probably be the second para here. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    •   Done
  • After the Oil Barons fell to the - the "X fell to Y" isn't fantastic writing, can we say "defeated", or "beat"? The term fell usually refers to soldiers dying in battle. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    •   Done
  • NCAA Men's Division I Western Collegiate Hockey Association - reword for links next to each other. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Air Force Falcons men's ice hockey team - probably on links like this, just need to say the Air Force Falcons. The rest is kinda implied. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    •   Done
  • Parayko's outstanding play - is this a quote? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Award,[17] - punct. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • During the first round, Parayko led the Blues over the Blackhawks by becoming the first defenseman in franchise history to score in a Game 7 - is this really all that notable? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • It was their very first Stanley Cup so he was the very first player in 50 years to ever score in Game 7.
  • Where is "Regular season and playoffs" sourced? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • At the very bottom of the article it says Biographical information and career statistics from NHL.com, or Eliteprospects.com, or Eurohockey.com, or Hockey-Reference.com, or The Internet Hockey Database

GA Review edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Review meta comments edit