Talk:Colpoda

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Microbiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marine life Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Marine life, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on marine life. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marine life To do:

Have a look at the Marine life WikiProject and sign up.

Here are some tasks you can do, as organized by The Marine life Wikiproject:

Collaboration of the week: Marine life article assessment
Other: See the projects page
Images: Upload any non-copyrighted marine life images to Wikimedia Commons
Featured Articles/Good Articles:
Other: Add {{Portal|Marine life}} to related articles

I can hardly claim to be an expert on this subject, and , in accordance with the ban on original research, I am providing references where possible. John Elson (talk) 14:49, 12 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Species edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Now that there is a list of species the original comment about about Colpoda inflata and other species seems redundant. John Elson (talk) 05:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Colpidium edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The section Uses by man includes a reference (and an associated sentence) about the species "Colpidium colpoda". I think it should be deleted because Colpidium is not the same genus as Colpoda.--Miguelferig (talk) 11:14, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I don't think that there is such a species as " Colpidium colpoda", it could be that this was meant to refer to both genera. Perhaps a little more research is needed on this one. John Alan Elson★ WF6I A.P.O.I. 02:10, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colpoda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716074144/http://www.soc.nii.ac.jp/jsproto/journal/jjp37/119-126.pdf to http://www.soc.nii.ac.jp/jsproto/journal/jjp37/119-126.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic