Talk:Colleen Shannon

the lawsuit

In re: the removal of information pertaining to the pending litigation over Playboy's use of a likeness of Colleen Shannon, from User talk:H Bruthzoo,

Good evening, while I agree that in the broad scope of things, a legal battle in which Colleen Shannon is not personally participating may seem trivial, however, 1) she is not a major celebrity and does not have any substantial news or acheivements to overshadow it, 2) it's not necessarily a battle for only $750, as nowhere is it indicated that that is the amount for which Playboy is being sued, and 3) if "trivia" pertaining to the details of her foot tattoo is viable for the article, I don't see how a federal lawsuit pertaining to her image could be considered too "trivial" for inclusion.

Perhaps it's something to be commented upon by a third party. I seek others' opinions on the talk page. LeSaint 06:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

If it can be reliably sourced, put the info in. Dismas|^(talk) 08:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

• I do have reliable sourcing on the matter. At what point is it deemed acceptable to revert the removal of the section? LeSaint 02:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

modelsobserver.com links

This and other Wikipedias in other languages have been relentlessly spammed by anonymous IPs based in Israel (where the domain is registered) for many months. It's gotten sufficiently bad as to warrant addition to the spam blacklist and I have removed a number of these links in anticipation of blacklisting:

• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
• meta:Talk:Spam blacklist#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)

Most, but not all, had been added by the site-owner.

If an established, high-volume editor sees value to the specific link I deleted from this article, please let me know and it can be evaluated for addition to the spam "whitelist"
--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Colleen Shannon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120706155957/http://www.playboy.com/girls/view/colleen-shannon to http://www.playboy.com/girls/view/colleen-shannon
• Added archive https://archive.is/20131223040140/http://abu-dhabi.platinumlist.net/nightlife/event/6145/THE-WORLD_S-SEXIEST-DJ-DJ-COLLEEN-SHANNON to http://abu-dhabi.platinumlist.net/nightlife/event/6145/THE-WORLD_S-SEXIEST-DJ-DJ-COLLEEN-SHANNON

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 1 January 2018 (UTC)