Talk:Collective trauma
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Collective trauma redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 September 2021 and 18 November 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mistry Shivani.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
July 2003
editThe last paragraph of this article, which was written 10 days after 9/11/2001, could do with updating. Does anyone feel in the position to write about collective trauma due to 9/11 two years down the line? Pete 10:48 9 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Psychological additions to this page
editHello,
As part of a university project, I have picked the collective trauma article to add on too. I plan to add onto the global impacts but with a more psychological and neurological focus of specific events, but this could be its own subheading about neurological impacts. I was also planning to add on a part about epigenetics and the biological effects of collective trauma. Another focus could be the PTSD aftermath and mental health links.
Thank you!
Lead too long?
editI am just wondering why it is being flagged that the lead is too long, when it is only two sentences. Is there a way to remove that as one of the issues in this article or is the problem something else? MU0212 (talk) 13:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Thomas Hübl is a problematic source
editThe last part of this article builds heavily on Thomas Hübl. This is problematic because:
- The quotes are not academic sources, not peer reviewed.
- The sources are his book, a blog post, and a TED talk.
- Thomas Hübl is not an academic.
- He is a "spiritual" or religous leader with a huge following.
- He is also not a non-profit leader, while he certainly started a non-profit.
- Thomas Hübl ownes a business that makes a lot of money with his teaching. Most of the mention here needs to be considered free marketing.
- Without being able to cite any academic criticism of his work, I know from psychologist friends, that his work is diametric against some academic research about trauma.
I would like to see this topic discussed by psychologist or other academics in a broader way. How can this discussion be initiated on Wikipedia? 62.96.232.178 (talk) 11:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Merge with historical trauma
editThere seems to be significant overlap between these two articles, although I'm not an expert on this at all. Alexanderkowal (talk) 09:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)