Talk:Collective trauma
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Collective trauma article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 September 2021 and 18 November 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mistry Shivani.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
July 2003 edit
The last paragraph of this article, which was written 10 days after 9/11/2001, could do with updating. Does anyone feel in the position to write about collective trauma due to 9/11 two years down the line? Pete 10:48 9 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Psychological additions to this page edit
Hello,
As part of a university project, I have picked the collective trauma article to add on too. I plan to add onto the global impacts but with a more psychological and neurological focus of specific events, but this could be its own subheading about neurological impacts. I was also planning to add on a part about epigenetics and the biological effects of collective trauma. Another focus could be the PTSD aftermath and mental health links.
Thank you!
Lead too long? edit
I am just wondering why it is being flagged that the lead is too long, when it is only two sentences. Is there a way to remove that as one of the issues in this article or is the problem something else? MU0212 (talk) 13:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Thomas Hübl is a problematic source edit
The last part of this article builds heavily on Thomas Hübl. This is problematic because:
- The quotes are not academic sources, not peer reviewed.
- The sources are his book, a blog post, and a TED talk.
- Thomas Hübl is not an academic.
- He is a "spiritual" or religous leader with a huge following.
- He is also not a non-profit leader, while he certainly started a non-profit.
- Thomas Hübl ownes a business that makes a lot of money with his teaching. Most of the mention here needs to be considered free marketing.
- Without being able to cite any academic criticism of his work, I know from psychologist friends, that his work is diametric against some academic research about trauma.
I would like to see this topic discussed by psychologist or other academics in a broader way. How can this discussion be initiated on Wikipedia? 62.96.232.178 (talk) 11:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC)