Talk:Colégio de Aplicação da UFRJ

Nonsense

I dont believe it's non sense ... it just needs further development

Not nonsense

It really is a school in Rio in which a wall nearly collapsed, causing space problems due to the reduced nunber of classrooms... the two cows is just a way to laugh at the tragedy...

• Ok, it's not nonsense anymore :) but I still still don't understand the sentence about the two cows, it doesn't make any sense without an explanation. KFP 15:16, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Yeah .. we'll try to explain it ... basically, following the two cows joke metaphor, we say what happened w/ our school: a wall collapsed (and thus "killed a cow"), and because of it we had classroom shortage problems, and our class has changed rooms many times since then (and that's the missing cow).

The Cows Joke

The cows joke shall be explained as an adendum in the article, such as: "There's a very common joke among current CAp students that [and the explanation goes here]" --Alberto msr 19:32, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Eu não creio que sim

I think it is clear and written well. Molotov (talk) 20:53, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Emblem

I believe the UFRJ Minerva logo should be substituted by the "CAp's shield" .. hehe .. o escudo.

I was waiting for a decent picture of the "coat of arms" to put as the logo. Since Minerva should be somewhere, I put her as the emblem. LaVega 17:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC) (Remember to sign your posts!)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ufrj logo.gif

Image:Ufrj logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Image nominated for deletion

This image, used in this article has been nominated for deletion, but the editor failed to post a notice on this page. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) ^{(talk / cont)} 00:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colégio de Aplicação da UFRJ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060112221232/http://acd.ufrj.br/cap50anos/ to http://acd.ufrj.br/cap50anos/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 11 August 2017 (UTC)