Talk:Codex Aureus of St. Emmeram

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

[Untitled] edit

I've added an image of the encrusted cover, a description of what is displayed on this cover and a short biography on the Codex (who had it made, who it was gifted to and where it ended up. I didn't list the fact that it is now in the Bayerische Bibliothek in München (Munich) due to the fact that this is not important for the history of the work and that I do not have much information regarding it's current resting place, if someone who knows more about this could add that i'd be much abliged —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cardolan (talkcontribs) 10:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Codex Aureus of St. Emmeram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply