Talk:Code talker/Archive 1

Archive 1

Broken page move: Codetalkers

Moved from Wikipedia:Village pump on Saturday, September 13th, 02003.

User:David Martland has moved the codetalkers article to code talkers using copy-and-paste, leaving the edit history behind. What is the way to fix this? —Paul A 06:32, 7 Sep 2003 (UTC)

The procedure is explained at Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page#Fixing cut and paste moves but can only be done by admins, which is what I believe Hephaestos is doing right now. Angela 06:38, 7 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Content in violation of WP:NOTFORUM

it extremely hard to beleive the japanese did not break this code. its possible they broke it and just didnt use their intel very effectively, for example if there was a lag of several days or more in between message interception, decryption, and decision making. considering that the japanese were able to successfully break far more sophisticated codes, I suspect this story has more than a bit of folk myth/hollywoodism mixed into it. especially considering that its now politically correct to heap praise on the formerly unrecognized native americans who participated in the project. Id like to see some sources, preferably japanese military, admitting they never broke it. Vroman 05:14, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC) Lieutenant General Seizo Arisue (the Japanese chief of intelligence) later on made it known that while other American codes were broken, the Navajo code was not. --Bletch 19:43, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC) This is suffering from broken links G Evans 4 nov 04 I recently read that on at least one occasions the German army in Russia used a something similiar during WW2 to call off an attack. Since the message could only be transmitted to an isolated unit via radio, the radio operator spoke Swabian, which the other operator understood but not the Russians who intercepted the message.

Many More photos to be added

• [1]
• Try and Obtain Official Marine Corps Photo #82619 Request to use photo #82619 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Razster (talk • contribs)

Basque

I have heard several times that among the codetalkers there were Basque speakers. Can somebody confirm?

I find Asunto: Code Talker that mentions:

• Battle of Guadalcanal
• Book Los españoles en la guerra del Pacífico by Daniel Arasa
• planned by Transmissions Captain Frank D. Carranza, son of Basque immigrants who noticed 60 bilingual Basque-descent marines at the transmissions training centert at San Francisco.
• Tests in Basque and North American languages start (1942) between San Diego and the Pacific headquarters
• Admiral Nimitz had as Basque translators lieutenants Nemesio Aguirre, Fernández Bakaicoa and Juanna
• To complicate things there was a schedule of languages:
  • Monday Basque
  • Tuesday Navajo
  • Wednesday Iroquois
  • Thursday Comanche
  • Friday Basque
  • Saturday Mix
  • Sunday Navajo
• Some examples of Basque messages.
• After Guadalcanal, it was difficult to find more codetalkers so Navajo was replacing the rest of languages.

In http://www.thememoryhole.org/foi/caselogs/dod-2002.xls :

• 899
• 02-F-0874
• OIARZABAL, PEDRO
• REQ ACCESS TO RESTRICTED RECORDS RELATED TO AMERICANS (OF BASQUE ORIGIN, I.E. FROM SPAIN OR FRANCE; BASQUE-FRENCH, OR BASQUE SPANISH) WHO SERVED IN WWII; USE OF BASQUE LANGUAGE TO TRANSMIT SENSITIVE MILITARY INFO DURING WWII (PACIFIC CAMPAIGN) BASQUE LANG

--Error 01:21, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

It seems that everybody is quoting Daniel Arasa's book. --Error (talk) 00:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Philip "Calcium Hydroxide" Johnston

What is the source of the nickname "Calcium Hydroxide" in 'Philip "Calcium Hydroxide" Johnston'? --Amir E. Aharoni 15:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

This was the only page on the internets with it, so I removed it. Random vandalism, presumably, tho I don't feel like hunting thru the logs to find out who added it, and what other pages they hit as well.--Severinus 22:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. --Amir E. Aharoni 07:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Expanded article

Perhaps the article could be expanded to include other occurences of usage of a lesser known language or dialect in order to obfuscate a message. Finland used some Finnish dialects and Ostrobothnian Swedish-language dialects to fool Soviet signals intelligence during the Winter War and Continuation War to great success (English-language sources for example W. Trotter's The Winter War). 88.148.192.117 13:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

I would have no problem with a "See also" entry pointing that an article about that, but the term "Code Talker" refers specifically to Native Americans. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) ^(Talk) 13:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

I support the idea of a paragraph about other instances of code talking besides Native Americans in the US military. What other page would such a story belong on? This is it. Binksternet 13:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Wiki for the Blind

I am 19 years old and blind. I am interested in adding relevant items to wiki that help the blind "visualize" and grasp the subjects at hand. I love the tradition of oral storytelling. I have added a link to a radio story by The American Storyteller.--Trgwilson (talk) 05:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Article name change

Why the article name change? Navajos are not the only American Indian tribe who were codetalkers not the first ... The article should be "Code Talkers" so as to be all inclusive ... otherwise I'll need to create a Choctaw code talkers article. Rob (talk) 22:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. This was a unilateral move by a new editor who didn't discuss ahead of time. I'm restoring the article to the way it was. Binksternet (talk) 22:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Shoot. The system prevented me from moving the article to Code talker like it was before. I was able to move it to Code Talkers instead, which doesn't wholly satisfy. The capital 'T' is leftover from the formal name of "Navajo Code Talkers" and the pluralization isn't the way it was before, though I can't see any benefit from having just one code talker... Binksternet (talk) 22:45, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I think the plural is better, if for no other reason than that code talkers had to work in groups of two or more! Is it possible (desirable?) to move this to Code talkers with lower case "t"? Robert Greer (talk) 23:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

No, I just tried and the system prevented me. Binksternet (talk) 19:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

You can file a request at WP:RPM to get the page moved to the right title. Tell the story briefly and an admin can sort it out. Franamax (talk) 21:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

I moved the page. I think the problem was that there already was a page "Code talker" that linked to "Code Talkers". -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) ^(Talk) 01:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Possible copyvio: Which page copied the other?

Hey folks,

Sections of this article read a lot like this page: [2] Did Wikipedia copy from samuelholiday, or did samuelholiday copy from Wikipedia? If they copied Wikipedia, that's fine, but they need to acknowledge Wikipedia. If we copied them, we need to remove all the copyvio elements (or substantially rewrite them). The sections are "Use of Navajo", "Cryptographic properties", and "Post-war Recognition". Thoughts? --Deathphoenix ʕ 18:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll be posting something similar to Talk:Joe Kieyoomia, as the article is virtually identical to the samuelholiday one. --Deathphoenix ʕ 18:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

The key here is the differences: the article says "words to represent letters" and the external link says "letters to spell out words" - so let's look through the article history to find if it was letters/words sometime in the past. Sure enough, it used to have that wording. Now you just have to work around to find some spot where the Wiki article is identical to the external article, that is a pretty good indication that someone has copied the wiki-text for themselves without giving a credit.

That seems to be the case here, I suspect the external site was copied from Wikipedia sometime between 02Aug06 and 06Dec06 - I'm not going to try to pin it down any more than that.

NB that I have a nifty little piece of software that lets me find phrases ultra-quick, I didn't walk back through the entire article history. :) Franamax (talk) 18:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Many thanks for the extra info. I'll contact the necessary Wikipedia PR folks who can contact this web site to provide proper attribution. Given the respect I have for the web site and its "owner", I hope they'll be gentle. :-) --Deathphoenix ʕ 19:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Good work in finding which old WP version matches the external one, but that doesn't quite prove who copied whom. If the article had been created or substantially rewritten by one editor in 2006, it would still look suspiciously like a copyvio. However, the previous history shows that dozens of editors built it over several years. I agree that the WP article is clearly original, and thus any copies elsewhere must be derivatives. Certes (talk) 21:42, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

The movie's fabrications

I think we should take all mention of the movie Windtalkers out of the article's body and put all that stuff in one section where its fabrications can be addressed. A few relevant things from the Windtalkers's "Criticism" section could be brought here. Binksternet 01:34, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Since there's only the one mention of the movie until the end of the article, I think it certainly could be removed from the top, but i disagree that there should be a large discussion of the film in this article. As you point out, there is already an article for the film with a substantial section on criticisms of it, and that's the appropriate place for it. I think a simple mention that a film was made, that it was fictional, and that it didn't accurately portray the true story of code talkers in WWII is all that's necessary here, and if people want more, they will go to the article for the film. norm77 13:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Good idea. Binksternet 15:26, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

One caveat is that people who only know about Code Talkers through the movie (or from others who have seen the movie) may have false impressions. This article should correct those false impressions, although it probably shouldn't be in a "this is a list of what was wrong about Windtalkers"-type way. Addressing the misperceptions just in the Windtalkers article isn't sufficient, because by the time people come here, they may not know that those misperceptions originally came from the movie Windtalkers. -- 128.104.112.85 (talk) 23:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I think the sentence involving code talker bodyguards should be edited because it misrepresents a critic's opinion as fact. [3] Title XI, section 1102 a10B Spider96 —Preceding comment was added at 09:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Also the sentence about fabrication of the bodyguards and racial stereotypes under Popular Culture cannot be attributed to the Ronin Group review. The review only offers the opinion that the bodyguards are an insult (not that they are fabricated) and it does not mention racial stereotypes at all. IanRiley 14:25, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Chinese regional languages

I heard yesterday from a Chinese friend that the Chinese used speakers of village dialects as code talkers during WWII. I don't have time to look for sources right now, but it would be an interesting addition to this article. --Slashme (talk) 12:36, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

GOCE

Mlpearc powwow 06:47, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Time discrepancies

So... the project wasn't declassified until 1968, but a Navajo code talker character was featured in a 1959 movie? Some clarification required.85.64.187.236 (talk) 21:17, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Yuval

"Classified" doesn't mean that no-one knew they existed. The program was classified, not the people. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 22:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

German anthropologists among the Native American tribes

Recent addition by unnamed IP address: " It can be noted that at that time:the Navajo asked these "white peaple", which differed from other Americans, of their intensions and were skeptical. Therefore, knowing of other Indain code used in warfare and stronge sence of pride, the Navajo strongly encouraged these 'Anrhropolgits' to leave immidiatly(These contacts with the 'outsiders' were reported to the U.S Goverment and/or Military during the war)." Among the spelling and grammar mishaps, there's a good story. Needs a reference, though. Binksternet 01:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

I reverted the edit about the time you entered this. I took it out because I wasn't sure if it was legit, and the spelling and grammar was so bad it could have been a joke edit. Has anyone heard this story? Any evidence to support the claims? -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) ^(Talk) 03:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Bill, I agree with your delete action; I saved the text here anticipating the originator's ability to find a reference. I haven't heard the story before but if true, it's worth inclusion. Binksternet 04:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

I've seen the story cited, pretty much as written above (w/o the spelling and grammar issues) but can't remember the source. As the Navajo of the time, late 30s as I recollect, were rather reclusive, it makes sense that they would have found this group of folk to be rather curious in their intense interest in the language and dialects. Irish Melkite (talk) 01:00, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Unlikely Example

"bomber was "pregnant airplane" " seems unlikely, as 'airplane' would hardly have been a term in any of the languages or dialects. In conversation with Native Americans, they indicate that words for 'new' or 'modern' things are rarely created. They either use the English language term or create a term using a combination of existing words in their tongue that effectively describe the idea - more often the former, if it's a concept that could be expected to be ongoing in their lives.

I've seen 'buzzard' - as referenced later in the article - as well as 'pregnant bird', 'mother bird', and a few other variants, but never 'pregnant airplane'. Irish Melkite (talk) 01:10, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

There are a bunch of books that say "pregnant airplane" was the term for bomber. Just looking now, I found a few that say "pregnant bird".

• "About 250 words or phrases were simply substituted, like 'pregnant bird' for bombing plane." Ed Gilbert, 2008. Native American Code Talker in World War II, p. 15
• "Because they had no word for bomber, they made a phrase that literally translated 'pregnant airplane.'" Emory Dean Keoke, Kay Marie Porterfield, 2003. American Indian Contributions to the World, p. 66
• "...bomber was 'pregnant airplane', machine gun was 'sewing machine' and Adolf Hitler became 'crazy white man'." George D Johnson, 2011. Profiles in Hue, p. 174
• "The Comanches, for instance, called a tank a 'turtle' and a bomber a 'pregnant airplane.'" Barry J. Blake, 2010. Secret language, p. 111
• "Charles J. Chibitty, the last surviving Comanche Code Talker... A tank became 'wah-kah-lay-ya' – a turtle – because it had a hard shell. 'Bomber' translated into 'pregnant airplane.' 'Po-sah-tie-vo' was used for Adolf Hitler, which means 'crazy white man'." The American Legion, volume 157, 2004, p. 55
• "So that's how the bomber got its name, no'avakatu hutsuu, pregnant bird." William C. Meadows, 2002. The Comanche code talkers of World War II, p. 103
• "Hutsuu no'avakatu – Pregnant bird – bomber" (from William C. Meadows) Tom Holm, 2007. Code talkers and warriors: Native Americans and World War II, p. 117

Perhaps we can add "pregnant bird" to the article, even though more sources say "pregnant airplane". Binksternet (talk) 01:52, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Blake's footnote to that line is to wikipedia, so it's circuitous. Notably, the only 2 books listed above which are specific to the subject of code talkers (Gilbert & Meadows) use the term 'pregnant bird'. Keoke & Porterfield's text is a generic compilation of Native American contributions to the world; Johnson's is a similar compilation only broadened to contributions by people of color.

That leaves the quote attributed to Charles Chibitty in the AL magazine. Every citation that I was able to find basically repeated Mr Chibitty's words - except one

"The Comanches had a native word for airplane, but could not distinguish among fighters, bombers and other types. The tribe members huddled and decided upon "Who-chew-no-ah Vuk-kuta" (pregnant airplane) for bomber."

That quote comes from http://www.wwiilectureinstitute.com/stories/foster.htm?cid=05 and is in a July 5, 2000 article titled "WWII Comanche code helped foil enemy" by By Edward Levenson, Philly Burbs Staff Writer. The article is about a talk given by Major General Hugh F. Foster, Jr. (Ret.) - who, as a 1st Lt in the Signal Corps, worked with the Comanche on development of their code.

So, on that basis, I guess pregnant airplane works as a Comanche term.

However, the Navaho Code Talkers Dictionary - at http://www.snowwowl.com/histcodedictionary.html - offers 'gini', translated as 'chicken hawk', for a dive bomber and 'jay-sho', translated as 'buzzard', for a bomber. A plane is 'sidi', translated as 'bird'. Irish Melkite (talk) 04:23, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Why "however"? What's your point? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:28, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

That 'pregnant airplane', 'buzzard', and 'pregnant bird' were all used as terms for bomber, depending on the tribe/language of the code-talker. Irish Melkite (talk) 04:34, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Note that we are not here to decide which source is the right one; we are here to decide which sources are prominent enough to tell the reader what they say. If two prominent, reliable sources say two different things, per WP:NPOV we list them both. It is entirely possible for us to say that the Choctaw term for bomber was either pregnant airplane or pregnant bird. Binksternet (talk) 04:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

@Irish Melkite: OK. Your use of "however" still doesn't make sense though. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:43, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Also: Choctaw terms were not the same as Navajo terms. The Navajo had several words for bomber, depending on what type. A level bomber was a buzzard, a dive bomber was a chicken hawk, and a torpedo bomber was a swallow. Binksternet (talk) 04:45, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Hopi tribe should be acknowledged

I was recently on Hopi as a visitor and met the daughter of a code talker who was part of the ceremony last week to get congressional gold medal from congress for their efforts. I'm a newbie so don't know how to do but hope someone will add? Also White Mountain and Tonto Apache as well. Reference: http://cronkitenewsonline.com/2013/11/native-american-code-talkers-belatedly-get-congressional-gold-medals/ Thanks, Jim Denverjims (talk) 03:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Who was first?

There's a discrepancy in this article. The second paragraph reads, "The name code talkers is strongly associated with bilingual Navajo speakers specially recruited during World War II by the Marines to serve in their standard communications units in the Pacific Theater. Code talking, however, was pioneered by Choctaw Indians serving in the U.S. Army during World War I. These soldiers are referred to as Choctaw code talkers."

Then in the section on Cherokee Code Talkers, there's this: "The first known use of Native Americans in the American military to transmit messages under fire was a group of Cherokee troops utilized by the American 30th Infantry Division serving alongside the British during the Second Battle of the Somme. According to the Division Signal Officer, this took place in September 1918. Their unit was under British command at the time.[2]"

Were the Choctaws or Cherokees the first code talkers? Jtyroler (talk) 16:16, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

The Choctaw and Cherokee programs were somewhat parallel to each other. The Choctaw were first in battle. I trimmed the lead section to (hopefully) eliminate the confusion. Binksternet (talk) 17:09, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Irish code talkers

I tried to find details of the use of the Irish language by the military. I think it was in Cyprus on a UN mission. Does anyone have details so that it can be added.--Dmol (talk) 14:34, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

I can't cite, but I can say while it's not common knowledge, it is widely accepted in common conversation that Irish soliders have used the language while on UN peacekeeping missions. Whilst I can't speak for the veracity, I've also heard that the Israeli army has had members trained in Irish to use in this manner as it's expected that given the difference in languages, it would be quite unlikely any opposition would have the language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.44.83.105 (talk) 02:53, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Section "Crytographic Properties" is overly specific - edit, rename, or move to new page

The section "Cryptographic Properties" only refers to those of Navajo. As this page is about code talkers in general, one of the following should happen:

• Edit the section
• Rename the section (i.e. to "... of Navajo")
• Move this section to a new page

At least, that's how it naively looks to me, but I'm not certain enough to make the change myself. Any reason to prefer status quo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.67.5.73 (talk) 13:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Non-American examples

Why are only American examples in the article? There were plenty of other nations who employed code talkers. Egypt used Nubian code talkers during the 1973 War with Israel. [4] [5] [6]Rajmaan (talk) 07:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Movie "Battle Cry" (1955)

During the battle towards the end of the movie, communications are placed in jeopardy as Japanese troops have captured a telephone rig (the line is a party line across the battle field, so all with a phone set can listen in simultaneously)

Concern is raised that the Japanese will be able to listen in to the battle instructions, however the gathered troops are reminded that they have Navajo language speakers in their company (refer to the main article Battle Cry ) who are then shown on film giving instructions in their language.

(I can only presume the actor's are genuinely speaking Navajo)

Timelord2067 (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Code talker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150608002323/http://www.armyhistory.org/ahf2.aspx?pgID=877&id=332&exCompID=56 to http://www.armyhistory.org/ahf2.aspx?pgID=877&id=332&exCompID=56

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:39, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Basque code talkers

Recent investigations suggest that Basque code talkers is a myth, created by OSS in order to build a net of basque informers. In Basque Wikipedia we have a full article about this topic in eu:Euskara_Bigarren_Mundu_Gerran, where we mention the idea of the basque code talkers, and the lack of references except the original publisher, in 1952. I think the article should reflect this recent research. -Theklan (talk) 18:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

@Theklan:

Hi, there, Theklan and all the others:

I'm trying to correct the Code Talkers article, because the existence of Basque code talkers has recently been refuted. I think I wrote first edition not very well, but after new trials the reviewer has threatened me with blocking me for use "unsourced material"... but I have added four sources with the new content. It looks more strange to me when I read the Hopi code talkers paragraph, which have no sources, but it seems no important in that case...

Could any experienced editor or reviewer help me and explain where is my mistake? I attach here the text I think should be more adequate:

In November 1952, Euzko Deya magazine published an article which explained that in May 1942, upon meeting about 60 U.S. Marines of Basque ancestry in a San Francisco camp, Captain Frank D. Carranza conceived the idea of using the Basque language for codes. His superiors were wary as there were known settlements of Basque in the Pacific region. There were 35 Basque Jesuits in Hiroshima, led by Pedro Arrupe. In China and the Philippines, there was a colony of Basque jai alai players, and there were Basque supporters of Falange in Asia. The American Basque code talkers were kept away from these theaters; they were initially used in tests and in transmitting logistic information for Hawaii and Australia.

On August 1, 1942, according to Euzko Deya, Lieutenants Nemesio Aguirre, Fernández Bakaicoa and Juanana received a Basque-coded message from San Diego for Admiral Chester Nimitz, warning him of the upcoming Operation Apple to remove the Japanese from the Solomon Islands. They also translated the start date, August 7, for the attack on Guadalcanal. As the war extended over the Pacific, there was a shortage of Basque speakers and the US military came to prefer the parallel program based on the use of Navajo speakers.

The Fighting Basques project , that pretends spreading the knowledge about the Basques during the World War II, has investigated about Basque code talkers and refuted the article and the existence of this group. The project has investigated about Basque ancestry soldiers and concluded that never existed any Frank D. Carranza (neither Nemesio Aguirre or Fernández Bakaicoa) in the U.S. Marines.

Main hypothesis about the origin of the story published by Euzko Deya (and repeated by other media) considers that it could be linked to a kind of coverage about the OSS operations in the Basque zone of the Spanish-French border (relevant for pro-Axis spanish government's wolfram exportations to the nazi Germany), in order to improve the sympathy of local people for the Allied cause. The name of Frank Carranza is, in that hypothesis, a spy codename. .

Jcabalo (talk) 08:06, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

References

Copyright Infringement

Hi all,

User:Judoka735 has removed the entire Navajo section without talking about it in the talk page, so I thought I would do it for him. The entire section is almost a copy of George D Johnson's book Profiles in Hue, p. 174-176. It needs to be changed. It can be read here. The section needs to be rewritten. Thanks! BigBryan0 (talk) 01:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

The book is plagiarizing Wikipedia, and not the other way around. Note how the book is dated 2011 whereas the exact same wording appears in a November 2009 revision. This book is not a reliable source, not only because it copy-pastes Wikipedia articles, but as a self-published source (see Xlibris). A cursory Google search shows that there are references to this specific publication in several other articles, which should be excised as circular sourcing by anyone who has the time. We are citing ourselves or a someone who has plagiarized us: take your pick, you can't be wrong! Maxim_(talk) 13:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, people. I'm sensitive to copyright infringement due to my occupation, but this is my first foray into correcting something in Wikipedia and clearly made a botch of it — it's tough to spot circular citations if you haven't any experience with it so I'll do better next time. Judoka735 (talk) 21:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Code talker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509165525/http://www.uwm.edu/~michael/choctaw/code.htm to http://www.uwm.edu/~michael/choctaw/code.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705135326/http://comanchelanguage.org/Comanche%20Code%20Talkers.htm to http://www.comanchelanguage.org/Comanche%20Code%20Talkers.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060830203241/http://bingaman.senate.gov/features/codetalkers/ to http://bingaman.senate.gov/features/codetalkers/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060612223153/http://www.yvwiiusdinvnohii.net/history/usmccode.htm to http://www.yvwiiusdinvnohii.net/history/usmccode.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Extraneous information

Under the 'Post-war recognition' section, it talks of President Trump's remarks about Elizabeth Warren. While I imagine most of us would agree that using the name of Pocahontas as a derogatory name, especially during an event focused on Native Americans, is distasteful, it honestly does not have anything to do with the Code Talkers as a whole or Post-war recognition specifically. It may not be a direct violation of NPOV, but in general injecting politics into an apolitical article tends to derail it. If there are no objections, I'd like to delete the off-topic material. 2602:306:BCF2:F200:25BA:76E7:8B2:23CC (talk) 18:53, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Code talker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109191414/http://www.yvwiiusdinvnohii.net/articles/navcode.htm to http://www.yvwiiusdinvnohii.net/articles/navcode.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109191414/http://www.yvwiiusdinvnohii.net/articles/navcode.htm to http://www.yvwiiusdinvnohii.net/articles/navcode.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:35, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi,

The website http://www.yvwiiusdinvnohii.net/ is still functional; however, the link http://www.yvwiiusdinvnohii.net/articles/navcode.htm redirects to the main page. There appears to be a very similar link that I found on the page for Joe Kieyoomia[7]. The new link is http://www.thepeoplespaths.net/articles/navcode.htm

Thank you --Azakea (talk) 16:33, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Cleanup

As some of you no doubt will have noticed, I have begun the desperately needed process of cleaning up this article. I find its formatting entirely unencyclopedic, what with its current format simply being a list of languages used for code talking. The section on Nubian code talkers, for example, is a single sentence backed up by five references. This is completely unnecessary.

Don't get me wrong, some sections are definitely well-written and sourced, but the article could definitely stand to improve from a thorough reorganization to be more in tune with the quality standards we strive to attain here at Wikipedia. Especially given the fact that this article's subject matter is deserving of a high quality article.

Please feel free to add to, correct, or even revert my edits as I go along. All I ask for is that you are open to collaboration and discussion. Thank you. Jay D'Easy (talk) 18:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Meskwaki Code Talkers

Interview with Donald Wanatee, Sr, Meskwaki (Sac & Fox) Tribal Council Member and stepson of a Meskwaki Code Talker, Marshalltown (Iowa) Historical Society, 16Aug2012.

    The Meskwaki code talkers were recruited in a special program in February 1941. Twenty-seven started the program but only eight graduated. The group had not been aware of any other tribes recruited this way. They spent the week in training locally at the Marshalltown Coliseum ; physical and wilderness training was implemented through hikes to the neighboring town of Albion and by camping along the river. On weekends, the tribe would go home to the Meskwaki Settlement. Once the U.S. was in the war, they were sent to Louisiana swamps for Army integration and the eight were sent to England and then to participate in the North African invasion, Nov 1942.
    At the Battle of Kasserine Pass, the first big U.S. battle against Rommel, in which the US Army was soundly whipped, the unit the code talkers were with ran out of ammunition and were told to disperse -- every man for himself and don't get caught. They headed south into the desert. The Air Force was supposed to provide search and rescue. The code talkers came out of hiding to wave at a passing U.S. plane, but it was followed by a German plane that reported their position and three of the eight were captured and spent the war as POWs -- Dewey Youngbear, Frank Santhe, Jude Wayne. Actually three were brothers named Wabaunasce, shortened in the Army to John Wayne, Mike Wayne and the captive, Jude Wayne. The remaining five continued code talking until the North African victory, then on to Sicily, Italy and France. One died of sickness and seven came home only when the war was over.
    Reference http://www.ww2pacific.com/codetlaker.html#meskwaki with Picture Gialappe (talk) 18:36, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

White House meeting

I reverted this edit primarily due to the removal of a number of inline citations. Please discuss the changes here. --mikeu ^talk 20:39, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

"Fluent"

It is slightly odd to speak of people being "fluent" in their native tongue. Fluency is generally thought to denote a high level of attainment in a language that is not the speaker's native tongue. Unless one feels that native-level mastery is the nec plus ultra of fluency...

Similar remarks can be made for "use of a complex language" etc - Native American languages can present tremendous difficulties to e.g. Europeans in terms of syntax, pronunciation, and so on, and it is no exaggeration to regard them as highly complex in that sense. But to its native speakers, any language seems natural and obvious and at all impenetrably complicated. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:C1D3:A600:CE87:620A (talk) 09:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Navajo

Navajo is not as isolated within the Na-Dene family as the article states; it is considered to be mutually intelligible with some or all Apachean languages. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:C1D3:A600:CE87:620A (talk) 10:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Meskwaki Nation Congressional Gold Medal (front).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Code talkers also from Sioux nation.

https://www.lakotatimes.com/articles/lakota-code-talkers-awarded-congressional-gold-medals/ https://www.nsa.gov/Press-Room/News-Highlights/Article/Article/2426846/the-last-sioux-nation-code-talker/ 2407:7000:8553:FD00:EC63:A9A5:C9AB:93C3 (talk) 08:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Navajo Code Talker death

One of the last 4 remaining Navajo Code Talkers Samuel Franklin Sandoval passed last in the early morning hours of 30 July 2022 in Shiprock NM. He was 99 years old. For more info call (256) 520-1489. 24.214.76.157 (talk) 02:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Goebbels calling Native Americans "Aryans"

I believe there are strong grounds for challenging the reliability of the source currently being used to substantiate the claim that Joseph Goebbels referred to Native Americans as "fellow Aryans." The citation currently in use is from a single book, published in 2012, and I've been unable to find any other references to support this assertion. After conducting extensive research, I've found no additional reliable records or secondary sources that back up this claim. Per WP:RS and WP:V, "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources." Further, WP:V instructs us to provide direct references to verify any information that is likely to be challenged or that is contentious. In this case, the source seems to fail both of these standards. The author of the book may have made a genuine error or may have been working from misinformation. However, without corroborating sources, it is unwise to accept this single reference as fact. In light of WP:NPOV, WP:BLPSPS (this underscores the importance of reliable, third-party verification in Wikipedia's guidelines), and WP:OR, I believe we should seriously consider removing this particular piece of information. It's critical to maintain a neutral point of view in our articles, and we should avoid presenting information that might be derived from original research or unverified claims. Given the contentious nature of this particular piece of information and its potential to mislead readers, I believe it is in the best interests of maintaining the accuracy and integrity of this article to remove it unless additional, reliable sources can be provided to substantiate the claim. 2600:4040:558F:2E00:E0F8:5C6F:E0BF:3108 (talk) 00:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)