Talk:Code of Vengeance/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: no disambiguations found

Link rot: no dead links found

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    I made a few copy-edits - mostly needed commas.[1]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    The article is adequately referenced to reliable sources, which support the cited statements.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Sufficient detail without trivia.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Three images used, with suitable tags and captions
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Well, I can't find anything wrong with this; I judge that it meets the GA criteria and will list it accordingly. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply