Talk:Coco Chanel & Igor Stravinsky

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Reality, rumour or chic fiction? edit

Anyone know if this year-long affair between Stravinsky and Chanel was a reality or is it a romantic embellishment that happens to fit nicely with an SATC/Brideshead Revisited-style movie (lots of nostalgia, flashy settings, Côte d'Azur dinners, ballet premieres and fashion product placements)? Books about Stravinsky abound but according to most of them his love interest from 1921 onwards was Vera de Bosset who became his de facto part-time wife, something Katerina was well aware of. But then Hollywood movies about cultural icons are not famous for sticking to the truth. Strausszek (talk) 11:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Title edit

Needs changing to 'Chanel Coco &...' See the I.M.D.B. Salopian (talk) 16:20, 30 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is a perfect demonstration why IMDb is not regarded as a reliable source. The title there is wrong. For a start, the film's own web page is the definitive source. What would be the sense in such a word order? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 08:44, 1 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Coco Chanel & Igor Stravinsky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply