Talk:Coat of arms of Saxony

Nine Stripes or Ten?

The article says nine stripes, the illustrations show ten. Also, can nine or ten stripes be simply "barry"? Is there a default number in German heraldry? If there is, is it nine or ten as shown? If it is not, then the blazon can't be just "barry" but would be "barry OF" such and such a number. Finally, if it really is nine stripes and not ten, wouldn't it be "sable, four bars or" (or, supposing that the outer stripes are gold, "or, four bars sable")? Doesn't "barry of" a certain number require an even number? If the count of stripes is odd and so the first and last stripes are the same color, then that color is the background color and the smaller number of stripes is lying ON that color. If the number of colors is even and so the first and last stripes are of opposite color, then neither color is background nor lying ON the other color. If these are not the rules of blazon for Germany, please point that out.69.86.130.90 (talk) 08:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Christopher L. Simpson

File:Gau Saxony 1933-1945.png Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Gau Saxony 1933-1945.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 28 October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:35, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

"herb of beautiful girls", "miracle cure", or "protection from misfortune"

I have removed two references in the gallery describing crancelin as "(common rue), the herb of the beautiful girls, a miracle cure and protection from misfortune".

• Having it twice is redundant
• Having it in the gallery of former images is inappropriate, given that the current arms also contain crancelin
• Regarding each of the stated attributes ("herb of beautiful girls", "miracle cure", or "protection from misfortune")
  • If it is uncited it should not be stated at all
  • If it has a specific association with its use in relation to Saxony, that should be stated in the main text of the article, not relegated to the gallery
  • Otherwise, it should be stated at crancelin or common rue rather than in this article.

The common rue article already says the herb is "an attribute of young girls, associated with virginity and maidenhood" but in Lithuania rather than Saxony. jnestorius^(talk) 13:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Coat of arms of Saxony. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130122221956/http://www.freistaat.sachsen.de/wappen_signet.htm to http://www.freistaat.sachsen.de/wappen_signet.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081122102236/http://www.fotw.net/flags/de-sn_lx.html to http://fotw.net/FLAGS/de-sn_lx.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Gallery

I've sectioned and sub-sectioned the gallery of images here; do we really need so many? Swanny18 (talk) 22:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
PS: And do we really need a quote from Mein Kampf as a reference? Swanny18 (talk) 22:51, 3 June 2018 (UTC)