Talk:Coat of arms of New Zealand

Latest comment: 9 months ago by 90.208.46.102 in topic Status and uses

Alice Spragg

edit

Alice Spragg was my partner's grandmother. She was the daughter of a chief Hansard reporter and granddaughter of one of Dunedin's most prominent families, and was a well known figure in pre-WWI Wellington. She is occasionally cited as being the model. There is no direct documentary evidence, but photographs of her from the time show a striking resemblance to the figure, and there is quite a lot of circumstantial evidence to suggest that she was the model. Grutness|hello?   00:12, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Redesign

edit

What was the reason for the 1956 alterations to the arms? Drutt 23:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • This page has some of the explanations. Seems that the design wasn't really formalised originally and all sorts of minor variations had been creeping in. Actually, there are some interesting factlets on that page that should find their way into the wikipedia article... Grutness...wha? 12:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:New Zealand Coat of Arms old.gif

edit
 

Image:New Zealand Coat of Arms old.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

There has been a fair use rationale in place on that page since it was loaded, you silly bot. Someone needs to give you a tweak! Grutness...wha? 06:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

not the coat of arm of 'New Zealand" IMHO

edit

except if you add that by 'NZ' you explicitely always mean 'the realm of NZ' (in effect 'the kingdom of NZ'). See here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy_of_New_Zealand where it is clear that NZ means the realm/kingdom not the country, that is what you usually call "NZ" plus the Cook Islands etc. That is why the CI don't have a real coat of arms, just a fancy one : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coat_of_arms_of_the_Cook_Islands — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.74.151.76 (talk) 04:34, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Crest

edit

I think it is incorrect to say that the crest was changed in 1956 - the Queen in right of New Zealand is entitled to a crown of rank (the imperial crown / crown of St Edward) as well as a crest (the demi-lion holding a Union Jack). What happened in 1956 is that the crest ceased to be depicted and the crown of St Edward was depicted instead. In England, there are two version of the Royal Arms, one with the crest and helm (used by the Queen and the judiciary) and one with the crown only (used by the Government). If you displayed the crest on top of the crown, it would still be a correct representation of the arms of New Zealand. For an example of a coat of arms with both, see the [1] Andrew Yong (talk) 06:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wholeheartedly agreed.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

pre-1956 design

edit

As well as deleting redundant text (which appears to have been copy-and-pasted), I have removed File:Coat of Arms of New Zealand (1911–1956).png. When compared to the actual design here, this file is clearly inaccurate, with the most glaring errors being the motto (which should be "Onward", not "Forward") and the figures (which should be forward-facing). The file should not be reinstated in the article unless improvements are made to it. --Hazhk (talk) 14:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The “fleece”

edit

Why is the sheep in a harness? MBG02 (talk) 16:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:52, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Who is the Maori on the right?

edit

Is it the most painted Maori by Goldie.............Te Aho O Te Rangi Wharepu alias Perata 112.213.47.218 (talk) 05:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Status and uses

edit

Since 1962, a banner of the arms, defaced with a royal symbol, has formed the sovereign's personal flag for New Zealand, for use by the Queen in her capacity as monarch of New Zealand.[13] The flag of the governor-general of New Zealand has, since 2008, featured the shield of the arms on a blue background.

Should this be corrected to say for use by the King in his capacity as monarch of New Zealand now? 90.208.46.102 (talk) 09:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply