Talk:Coat of arms of Bulgaria

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Illegitimate Barrister in topic 1991-1997

Fair use rationale for Image:Bulgaria passport 1944.jpg edit

 

Image:Bulgaria passport 1944.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Should edit

If willing, republics should crown their arms with mural crown, such as Malta or the Second Spanish Republic.

Actually there should be no "should" in Wikipedia. The scope is not to prescribe how things ought to be, but to describe how thy are. --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

1946 & 1948 edit

This coat of arms is presented as being 1948 only, but this flag is shown as being 1946-67. And this flag is shown as 1948-67. Something's clearly wrong. Let me get this straight... as far as I can see, this and this should both be 1946-48, then this is therefore correct to be shown as 1948-67. Am I correct? And, if so, perhaps the actual file names for the image files should also be changed so as to avoid confusion??? BigSteve (talk) 13:54, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

p.s. I found info here that explains that the red version was only used for a couple of months in 1948, but it's not clear if it was ever added to the flag...? BigSteve (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:24, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coat of arms of Bulgaria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

1991-1997 edit

Anyone have a pic of the 1991 to 1997 emblem? – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 23:13, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply