Talk:Co-cathedral

Repeated vandalism

I am not an expert in the technicalities, procedures and formalities of Wikipedia. Usually, I just contribute a bit where I can without stepping on the toes of anyone. Hence I can only ask a few that I found to know better, Daniel Case and Lord Roem, for their help. Personally, I am not interested in this specific article, and not invested in it. But when I've seen vandalism in it, I, stupidly, tried to revert it. I did not do it in the correct way. Now, the vandalism continues, and I let it go. But there are others, maybe also not experts in editing Wikipedia, who try to prevent the mass deletion of stuff without proper discussion. The one who does this mass deletion has changing IPs so none of us know anything about her/his expertise, but yet s/he feels well in bashing those who revert what seems to be vandalism. So, it is now in your good hands. Again, I am not a part of this discussion about Co-cathedrals. Thanks, Agmonsnir (talk) 07:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

There is far to much uncited detil in this article, which has been falgged since at least 2017. Removing unreferenced material is not vandalism, although the IP doing it could have discussed more and reverted less. I would suggest the best way forward is to find proper referencing for all the unreferenced sections. That way it won't be removed in future. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 15:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)