Talk:Clotted cream/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 16:33, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 16:33, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry for the delay, I tend to do more than one review at a time and there were some over-runs. Pyrotec (talk) 12:24, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

An informative and well referenced article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Well referenced.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced, as a whole but I would have expected a citation for the claim, in the second of these two sentences: "As clotted cream is not regularly available outside South West England, there are a number of ways to create an approximation. One example is to mix mascarpone with whipped cream, a little sugar and vanilla extract."

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Well illustrated.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing an informative and well-referenced article on this food topic. Pyrotec (talk) 12:24, 30 January 2011 (UTC)