Talk:Clonostachys rosea f. rosea

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Problem with link to Clonostachys genus edit

I noticed that when I clicked on the link to Clonostachys in the taxobox, that the link went to a genus of plants with the same synonym. Apparently there needs to be some kind of disambiguation page created. Anyone have any suggestions?

I tried looking at the Clonostachys genus to find a picture. Anyone have a free picture of Clonostachys rosea f. rosea to add to the article?

WriterHound (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • I've made a disambig at Clonostachys. I believe that Clonostachys rosea is the only member of the fungus genus Clonostachys [1]. If that is correct it should be mentioned here I guess. Juzhong (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Benefit Section edit

RE:Biofuel, To say that C. rosea doesn't generate CO2 emisions is idiotic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.216.233 (talk) 05:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've removed this misplaced statement about emissions, because clearly the hydrocarbons that this fungus produces would create CO2 emissions if burned. Also, I paraphrased the point that Strobel makes about biofuel production using waste instead of food, and I corrected the related citation. Finally, I retitled this section, as the benefit garnered from using waste instead of food for fuel has socioeconomic implications. Mtobey (talk) 18:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bionectria ochroleuca edit

>Is it the anamorph? Are two articles needed ? --Pinof (talk) 10:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Biofuels Section edit

Dr. Gary Strobel had a new paper (Microbilogy (2010), 156, 3814-3829) about the strain found in the Patagonian Forest. They made a mistake, it's not a Clonostachys rosea strain who produce hydrocarbons founds in diesel, they corrected it's a Ascocoryne sarcoides. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salome Zaldua (talkcontribs) 21:08, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clonostachys rosea f. rosea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply