Talk:Clitoris/Archive 17

Archive 10

←

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Proposal to split into Human clitoris and Clitoris articles

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This is a follow-up to Suggestion 1 of the discussion that FlipertyFlop posted above. This is then a proposal to split this article into Human clitoris and Clitoris, just as there are a Human penis and Penis articles. The Human clitoris is currently a redirect to Clitoris.

A general Clitoris article will contain discussion of subtopics that are unrelated to the Human clitoris such as:

• Os clitoridis & the incidence of ossification in the canine clitoris
• Female hyenas' clitoris with a pseudo-penis appearance
• Hemiclitores
• Clitoris in lizard, ostriches, & snakes, probably an example of convergent evolution
• Non-human cunnilingus
• Coverage of the primate clitorises
• Coverage of the internal clitorises

I believe that having at least ten reliable sources usually establishes notability, particularly when those multiple sources provide "Significant coverage" and vary in quality and depth of coverage as per the General notablity guideline. Below are over fifty sources that establish notability for a mostly non-human Clitoris article modeled after the Penis article. They are sourced from general news articles, scholarly papers, books, & scientific journals.

• Pavlicev, Mihaela; Herdina, Anna Nele; Wagner, Günter (2022-05-07). "Female Genital Variation Far Exceeds That of Male Genitalia: A Review of Comparative Anatomy of Clitoris and the Female Lower Reproductive Tract in Theria". Integrative and Comparative Biology. 62 (3). Oxford University Press (OUP): 581–601. doi:10.1093/icb/icac026. ISSN 1540-7063.
• Rosa-Aquino, Paola (2022-12-23). "Tons of other animals have clitorises - and they can teach us more about human sexuality". Business Insider. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
• MUNARRIZ, RICARDO; KIM, SOO WONG; KIM, NOEL N.; TRAISH, ABDULMAGED; GOLDSTEIN, IRWIN (2003). "A Review of the Physiology and Pharmacology of Peripheral (Vaginal and Clitoral) Female Genital Arousal in the Animal Model". Journal of Urology. 170 (2S). Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000075352.03144.15. ISSN 0022-5347.
• Katie Hunt, Madeline Holcombe (2022-12-15). "Researchers have found that snakes have a clitoris. Here's what it could mean". CNN. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
• Gross, Rachel E. (2022-03-31). "Why Have Female Animals Evolved Such Wild Genitals?". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
• Black, Riley (2023-03-13). "Why Did Scientists Wait So Long to Study the Snake Clitoris?". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
• Gentle, Louise (2023-02-16). "Why Snakes Have Two Clitorises and Other Mysteries of Female Animal Genitalia". Scientific American. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
• Ouellette, Jennifer (2022-01-19). "Study: Female dolphins have a working clitoris, so they probably enjoy sex". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
• Smith, Belinda (2022-12-14). "Snakes have a clitoris too, and scientists have just found it in nine species - ABC News". ABC. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
• Bondar, Carin (2018-06-12). "For Some Species, the Girls Come with Boy Bits". Nature. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
• "Reproductive Anatomy and Physiology of Cattle". Default. 2020-11-05. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
• Burton, Frances D. (2004-11-29). "Sexual climax in female Macaca mulatta". TSpace Repository. OCLC 704342629. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
• KATO, Morio (1955). "Histology of Clitoris in Dog and its Innervation, Especially Sensory Innervation". Archivum histologicum japonicum. 9 (1). International Society of Histology & Cytology: 21–40. doi:10.1679/aohc1950.9.21. ISSN 0004-0681.
• Parada, M.; Jafari, N.; Pfaus, J.G. (2013). "Sexual experience blocks the ability of clitoral stimulation to induce a conditioned place preference in the rat". Physiology & Behavior. 119. Elsevier BV: 97–102. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.06.005. ISSN 0031-9384.
• Min, K; O'Connell, L; Munarriz, R; Huang, Y-H; Choi, S; Kim, N; Goldstein, I; Traish, A (2001-06-01). "Experimental models for the investigation of female sexual function and dysfunction". International Journal of Impotence Research. 13 (3). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 151–156. doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3900683. ISSN 0955-9930.
• Glickman, Stephen E.; Short, Roger V.; Renfree, Marilyn B. (2005). "Sexual differentiation in three unconventional mammals: Spotted hyenas, elephants and tammar wallabies". Hormones and Behavior. 48 (4). Elsevier BV: 403–417. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.013. ISSN 0018-506X.
• Basanta, Silvia; Nuño de la Rosa, Laura (2022-12-15). "The female orgasm and the homology concept in evolutionary biology". Journal of Morphology. 284 (1). Wiley. doi:10.1002/jmor.21544. ISSN 0362-2525.
• Carosi, Monica; Spani, Federica; Ulland, Amy E.; Scalici, Massimiliano; Suomi, Stephen J. (2020-04-22). "Clitoral length in immature and mature captive tufted capuchin ( Sapajus spp.) females: A crosssectional study". American Journal of Primatology. 82 (11). Wiley. doi:10.1002/ajp.23135. ISSN 0275-2565.
• Pouydebat, Emmanuelle (2022-03-14). "The Singing Penis and Other Sex Secrets of the Animal World". Time. Retrieved 2023-03-18.
• Pouydebat, Emmanuelle; Terrazzoni, Julie; Butler, Erik (2022). Sexus animalis : there is nothing unnatural in nature. Cambridge, Massachusetts. ISBN 978-0-262-04658-9. OCLC 1242021169.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
• Sinclair, Adriane Watkins; Glickman, Stephen; Catania, Kenneth; Shinohara, Akio; Baskin, Lawrence; Cunha, Gerald R. (2017-03-02). "Comparative Morphology of the Penis and Clitoris in Four Species of Moles (Talpidae)". Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution. 328 (3). Wiley: 275–294. doi:10.1002/jez.b.22732. ISSN 1552-5007.
• Moore, Brandon C.; Kelly, Diane A.; Piva, Milan; Does, Mark; Kim, Dong Kyu; Simoncini, Melina; Leiva, Pamela M.L.; Pina, Carlos I. (2021-07-08). "Genital anatomy and copulatory interactions in the broad snouted Caiman ( Caiman latirostris )". The Anatomical Record. 305 (10). Wiley: 3075–3087. doi:10.1002/ar.24699. ISSN 1932-8486.
• Parada, Mayte (2013). The Role of the Clitoris in Sexual Behaviour and Reward In the Female Rat. Montréal: Concordia University. OCLC 1032883938.
• Min, Kweonsik; Munarriz, Ricardo; Berman, Jennifer; Kim, Noel N.; Goldstein, Irwin; Traish, Abdulmaged M.; Stankovic, Miljan R. (2001). "Hemodynamic Evaluation of the Female Sexual Arousal Response in an Animal Model". Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 27 (5). Informa UK Limited: 557–565. doi:10.1080/713846801. ISSN 0092-623X.
• Sumner, Scarlett M.; Grimes, Janet A.; Wallace, Mandy L.; Schmiedt, Chad W. "Os clitoris in dogs: 17 cases (2009–2017)". The Canadian Veterinary Journal. 59 (6). PMID 29910473. Retrieved 2023-03-18.
• Barbe, Mary F.; Gomez-Amaya, Sandra M.; Salvadeo, Danielle M.; Lamarre, Neil S.; Tiwari, Ekta; Cook, Shalonda; Glair, Connor P; Jang, Daniel H.; Ragheb, Rachel M.; Sheth, Akaash; Braverman, Alan S.; Ruggieri, Michael R. (2018-03-30). "Clarification of the Innervation of the Bladder, External Urethral Sphincter and Clitoris: A Neuronal Tracing Study in Female Mongrel Hound Dogs". The Anatomical Record. 301 (8). Wiley: 1426–1441. doi:10.1002/ar.23808. ISSN 1932-8486.
• Bechara, A J; Cao, G; Casabé, A R; Romano, S V; Toblli, J E (2003-06-01). "Morphological modifications in clitoris and vagina in spontaneously hypertensive rats". International Journal of Impotence Research. 15 (3). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 166–172. doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3900982. ISSN 0955-9930.
• Cunha, Gerald R.; Baskin, Laurence S. (2020). "Development of the external genitalia". Differentiation. 112. Elsevier BV: 7–9. doi:10.1016/j.diff.2019.10.008. ISSN 0301-4681. PMID 31881402.
• MUNARRIZ, RICARDO; KIM, SOO WONG; KIM, NOEL N.; TRAISH, ABDULMAGED; GOLDSTEIN, IRWIN (2003). "A Review of the Physiology and Pharmacology of Peripheral (Vaginal and Clitoral) Female Genital Arousal in the Animal Model". Journal of Urology. 170 (2S). Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000075352.03144.15. ISSN 0022-5347.
• Cunha, Gerald R.; Sinclair, Adriane; Ricke, Will A.; Robboy, Stanley J.; Cao, Mei; Baskin, Laurence S. (2019). "Reproductive tract biology: Of mice and men". Differentiation. 110. Elsevier BV: 49–63. doi:10.1016/j.diff.2019.07.004. ISSN 0301-4681.
• Cunha, Gerald R.; Liu, Ge; Sinclair, Adriane; Cao, Mei; Baskin, Laurence (2020). "Clitoral development in the mouse and human". Differentiation. 111. Elsevier BV: 79–97. doi:10.1016/j.diff.2019.07.006. ISSN 0301-4681.
• Cruz, Yolanda; Juárez, Raúl; Medel, Alfonso; Corona-Quintanilla, Dora Luz; Pacheco, Pablo; Juárez, Margarita (2016). "Coital Urinary Incontinence Induced by Impairment of the Dorsal Nerve of the Clitoris in Rats". Journal of Urology. 195 (2). Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health): 507–514. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.105. ISSN 0022-5347.
• Nasoori, Alireza (2020-04-27). "Formation, structure, and function of extra‐skeletal bones in mammals". Biological Reviews. 95 (4). Wiley: 986–1019. doi:10.1111/brv.12597. ISSN 1464-7931.
• Conley, Alan; Place, Ned J; Legacki, Erin L; Hammond, Geoff L; Cunha, Gerald R; Drea, Christine M; Weldele, Mary L; Glickman, Steve E (2020). "Spotted hyaenas and the sexual spectrum: reproductive endocrinology and development". Journal of Endocrinology. 247 (1). Bioscientifica: R27–R44. doi:10.1530/joe-20-0252. ISSN 0022-0795.
• Martínez-Silvestre, Albert; Bargalló, Ferran; Grífols, Jordi (2015). "Gender Identification by Cloacoscopy and Cystoscopy in Juvenile Chelonians". Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice. 18 (3). Elsevier BV: 527–539. doi:10.1016/j.cvex.2015.04.009. ISSN 1094-9194.
• Coates, Kimberly W.; Galan, Henry L; Shull, Bobby L.; Kuehl, Thomas J. (1995). "The squirrel monkey: An animal model of pelvic relaxation". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 172 (2). Elsevier BV: 588–593. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(95)90577-4. ISSN 0002-9378.
• Gredler, Marissa L.; Larkins, Christine E.; Leal, Francisca; Lewis, A. Kelsey; Herrera, Ana M.; Perriton, Claire L.; Sanger, Thomas J.; Cohn, Martin J. (2014). "Evolution of External Genitalia: Insights from Reptilian Development". Sexual Development. 8 (5). S. Karger AG: 311–326. doi:10.1159/000365771. ISSN 1661-5425.
• Martin-Alguacil, Nieves; Pfaff, Donald W.; Shelley, Deborah N.; Schober, Justine M. (2008). "Clitoral sexual arousal: an immunocytochemical and innervation study of the clitoris". BJU International. 101 (11). Wiley: 1407–1413. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.2008.07625.x. ISSN 1464-4096.
• Sinclair, Adriane Watkins; Glickman, Stephen; Catania, Kenneth; Shinohara, Akio; Baskin, Lawrence; Cunha, Gerald R. (2017-03-02). "Comparative Morphology of the Penis and Clitoris in Four Species of Moles (Talpidae)". Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution. 328 (3). Wiley: 275–294. doi:10.1002/jez.b.22732. ISSN 1552-5007.
• McAllister, Raymond Alexander (1988). The equine clitoris : a study of its structure and development. OCLC 63931148.
• Mariassy, Andrew Tibor (1972). Comparative anatomy of the clitoris of a selected group of domestic animals. OCLC 81703367.
• Hunter, John (1786). Observations on certain parts of the animal oeconomy. London: Sold at no. 13, Castle-Street, Leicester-Square. OCLC 682194812 – via Wellcome Collection.
• Simmerman, Neil (2000). The rat as a model of female sexual arousal. [Montreal]: McGill University Libraries. OCLC 898067870 – via Canada.ca.
• Campbell, Berry (1976). "Neurophysiology of the Clitoris". In Lowry, Thomas P.; Lowry, Thea Snyder (eds.). The Clitoris. St. Louis: W.H. Green. p. 41. ISBN 0-87527-112-X. OCLC 2357876 – via Internet Archive.
• Watson, M. (October 1879). "The Homology of the Sexual Organs Illustrated by Comparative Anatomy and Pathology". Journal of Anatomy. 14: 50–80. ISSN 0021-8782. OCLC 844602236 – via HathiTrust. In particular, see Comparative Anatomy of the Clitoris page 72.
• Fleming, George (1896). "Female Generative Organs". A Text-book of Veterinary Obstetrics: Including the Diseases and Accidents Incidental to Pregnancy, Parturition, and Early Age in the Domesticated Animals. London, Toronto: Baillière, Tindall and Cox ; Carveth. OCLC 890841270 – via HathiTrust. See page 31.
• Watson, M. (1877-05-01). "On the Female Generative Organs of Hyæna crocuta". The proceedings of the scientific meetings of the Zoological Society of London (XXIV): 368–379. ISSN 2397-5490. OCLC 609477855 – via HathiTrust.
• DePierre, David (2017). "Introduction". Brief History of Oral Sex. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers. pp. 3–10. ISBN 1-4766-3027-5. OCLC 990413001. See discussion on cunnilingus for the Indian flying fox, hyena, & bonobo.
• Holekamp, Kay E. (2011-06-29). "Male or Female? Good Question!". Scientist at Work Blog. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
• Macalister, Alexander (1864). "On the Anatomy of the Ostrich (Struthio camelus)". Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy (1836-1869). 9. Royal Irish Academy: 1–24. ISSN 0302-7597. JSTOR 20488878. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
• "All female mammals have a clitoris – and we're just starting to work out what that means for their sex lives". ABC. 2019-04-09. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
• Strickland, Charlene (1996-11-01). "Anatomy and Physiology of a Mare's Reproductive System". The Horse. Retrieved 2023-03-21.
• "Reproductive Tracts and Genitalia". University of Minnesota Libraries – Pressbooks Publishing Platform. Retrieved 2023-03-21.

Let's divide this extensive topic into two articles, modeling Clitoris after Penis and Human clitoris after Human penis. Peaceray (talk) 05:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Survey and discussion

Good idea, I agree. Sciencia58 (talk) 09:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Entirely reasonable. The penis homology argument is irrelevant really, but could be applied to many anatomical structures (such as ovary). The non-human content seems to be the smaller section and could be moved out with appropriate linkage Michael Goodyear ✐  ✉ 15:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

The homology argument really does not have an influence on the proposal, but needs to be included as appropriate within the articles because it is frequently mentioned in the anatomical sources. Peaceray (talk) 05:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Something that's notable can still be covered in another page, per WP:No page. This is a WP:GA, so I don't see benefit in dividing it up simply because the penis articles do that. That may not be ideal even for them; or if it is, it does not follow that the same should be done here. Crossroads ^-talk- 19:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Clitoris & Human Clitoris are both notable, & there are certainly more than enough citations to support both articles. I think this is justified as per WP:CONTENTSPLIT.

To be clear, I am not suggesting that we split the article up because there is a Penis article & a Human penis article. I was merely suggesting using those articles as a model.

As of 05:00, 24 March 2023 UTC, at over 200,000 bytes, it is twice the threshold for the Rule of Thumb's Readable prose size (kB) at WP:SIZESPLIT. The recommended What to Do is Almost certainly should be divided.

I see no reason why a GA article that is too large cannot become two GA articles! Peaceray (talk) 05:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Comment (Followed notification on WP:WH's talk page.) Xtools' reported page size can be misleading, as it looks at the whole page; including image annotations, refs, bibliographies etc, as well as elements invisible to readers (such as markup). Wikipedia:Prosesize gives a more accurate count for prose articles and reports a readable page size of 71kB in this instance. Whilst this is comfortably above the >60kB Probably should be divided threshold, that does have the caveat of [...] the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading time. (Please note that Prosesize also has its limitations. For example, it ignores prose formatted within list or table markup.) Little pob (talk) 14:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

These move discussions come around regularly on the sex-related pages. It always worries me that it is just something to make sex-related information less available and less visible to visitors, especially younger visitors, to the encyclopedia. Why are similar moves so rarely proposed for other anatomy articles? Are we going to move arm to human arm? Toes to human toe? No? I thought not. While we're at it, how long before someone comes along wanting to move masturbation to human masturbation? Foreskin to human foreskin? No. There is no need to bury or hide Wikipedia's articles about sex and sexuality. They're fine where they are - in the place of minimum surprise, where most people would expect to find them. --Nigelj (talk) 12:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

@Nigelj: I would suggest you read WP:SPLITTING. As per WP:Prosesize >60kB, size indicates Probably should be divided (although the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading time) I would argue that there are two different scopes here (human & animal in general). There are certainly enough citations on the subtopic to consider splitting out on the basis of content.

Part of my reasoning for a split is that there are significant differences between human clitorises & many animal clitorises.

• Some animals have a clitoris that only appears internally.
• The spotted hyena has a pseudo-penis for a clitoris.
• The clitorises of ostriches & reptiles (including snakes) may have been due to convergent evolution.

Also, with respect to your WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST argument, I would note that the toe article is woefully human-centric & possibly anthropormorphic.

Regarding arguments of WP:PLA, well, we use {{for}}, {{about}}, {{see also}}, & {{main}} all the time. Anyone going to clitoris could quickly find their way to human clitoris. I would argue that we would do a disservice to someone who is just interested in the human clitoris by forcing them to navigate the extensive information about differently shaped, located, or evolutionary animal clitorises. Peaceray (talk) 04:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

@Peaceray Yes, someone who's just discovered that there is such a thing as a clitoris, or that it has a name that can be searched, won't be in the least surprised to find an article about spotted hyenas, ostriches and reptiles. My argument is not about splitting, it's about which article gets the simple, high-traffic, headline name. --Nigelj (talk) 09:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

At the risk of WP:WHATABOUT, I would point to the Human behavior, Human body, Human evolution, Human extinction, Human genome, & Human skeleton articles. Do you mean we should have put those in Behavior, Body (biology), Evolution, Extinction, Genome, & Skeleton respectively?

I argue against cramming everything into one article. There is plenty of opportunity to grow both clitoris & human clitoris. I think it is a bad idea to rely on high-traffic to justify making an article more complex & lengthy than it needs to be. We have solved the problem of directing readers to subtopics with the {{for}} & {{main}} templates. Peaceray (talk) 00:36, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Given WP:AT applies (WP:CONSISTENT specifically); then human clitoris is exactly the right target. I'm just wondering what will be left for a broad topic article once the bulk of the human content is split? Or is it that, given the article's size, the split needs to happen first? Little pob (talk) 10:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

@Little pob: As to what is left concerning the non-human clitoris, please see my comments & the 50+ references at the Talk:Clitoris#Proposal to split into Human clitoris and Clitoris articles section. Peaceray (talk) 02:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Do you have anything sandboxed anywhere? Given the article is tagged WP:GA, it would help assuage fears that no-one works on expanding the content should the split occur. Little pob (talk) 18:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

I don't have permissions to edit this page, but the proposal seems reasonable. PistachoCash (talk) 01:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

The "Other animals" section has grown since the GA review, so a split out of the material in that section to a sub-article looks appropriate. As the primary topic for "clitoris" is the human clitoris, and that is what most readers of this high profile and popular article would be looking for when they type in "clitoris", this main article should retain the name Clitoris, and a disambiguation name sought for the article on animal or non-human clitoris. Possible: Clitoris (non-human), Clitoris (animal), Non-human clitoris, Animal clitoris. SilkTork (talk) 18:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, that makes sense, & would preserve Flyer22 Frozen's edit history (in sort of a memoriam) as main part of the material being split. Flyer22 Frozen was most responsible for this article, & seemed to be mostly focused on the human clitoris. Peaceray (talk) 19:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

References

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split to Animal clitoris

I have actioned the consensus to create an article on animal clitoris. All material from the Other animals section has been moved into Animal clitoris, and I have created a link to the new article and started to summarise and reduce the Other animals section. Work is needed to build the Animal clitoris article, and to finish summarising the Other animals section. Difficult to know which name to use. If folks prefer a different name - Clitoris (non-human), Non-human clitoris, Clitoris (animal), or something else, and there is consensus, then I'll be happy to do the move. SilkTork (talk) 08:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

I've updated the above from Clitoris (animal) to Animal clitoris. But I'm really not sure which works best. SilkTork (talk) 13:21, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

@SilkTork: Was there any consensus about the name of this new article? It seems contrary to Wikipedia's usual naming conventions, where articles about human anatomy include the word "human":

• Brain and Human brain instead of Animal brain and Brain,
• Reproductive system and Human reproductive system instead of Animal reproductive system and Reproductive system,
• Penis and Human penis instead of Animal penis and Penis,
• Skeleton and Human skeleton instead of Animal skeleton and Skeleton,
• Head and Human head instead of Animal head and Head,
• Mouth and Human mouth instead of Animal mouth and Mouth.

Shouldn't the articles be titled Clitoris and Human clitoris, as suggested in this discussion? Jarble (talk) 14:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

No, because the WP:Primary topic for human clitoris is clitoris. While many animals have the body parts you describe above, the clitoris is limited to a rather smaller group of animals, and the bulk of research and available material is on the human clitoris. Such that when talking about the clitoris the assumption is that it is the human clitoris. For example, compare Britannica's article on the [ https://www.britannica.com/science/clitoris clitoris], with that of the penis. The clitoris article is simply about the human clitoris, and does not feel the need to differentiate. The penis article, however, is about the penis in general, and does differentiate when talking about the human penis. I hope that helps. SilkTork (talk) 17:47, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Actually I think for topics in general it's the main topic and then specific smaller topics and not ANY specific topic as the main topic. So for brain it would be brain, human brain and animal brain but because all animals have a brain of some sort it's also the main topic and makes animal brain redundant. However when people talk about clitoris it's almost always the human one as the main topic. Biofase ^flame| stalk  12:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 August 2023

Hello, I would like to link Dr Helen O’Connell’s Wikipedia page to the existing mention of her name and her work contained in the current Clitoris page. Dr O’Connell’s 1990s research ‘mapped’ the clitoris as we know it today and yet her name is not currently linked out here and this undermines her significance. Thank you.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_O%27Connell_(urologist) Tryingtocontributeandeducate (talk) 23:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

 Already done It's already linked twice. Per WP:OVERLINK we don't link it over and over again. Cannolis (talk) 01:44, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Can we add some skin tone diversity to the photos of genitals in this and other Wikipedia pages?

It’s harmful to have only light skinned photos of anatomy, it marginalized people with darker skin and results in medical mistakes when both medical providers and lay people learn about human anatomy only with a light skin tone. I’m not an expert on medical photos and don’t necessarily but know there has been a long-standing problem in the medical community with this, and it perpetuates racism. Both seeing and treating white people as the “default” and also medical errors and mistreatment of BIPOC people. I just wanted to raise the issue and see if anyone has ideas of where to get some more inclusive photos? Thank you! Mspandana (talk) 05:48, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

All photos come from Wikimedia Commons, so check there. Mathglot (talk) 08:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)