Talk:Climate change delusion

This environment-related redirect is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles

Climate change

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to climate change, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Bot tag was in error edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A bot placed a copyright violation tag on the page saying the article copied text from another article. While that is true, the text in question was a quote from a medical journal, and was properly attributed, in accordance with Fair use. I removed the tag. Grundle2600 (talk) 20:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Redirected edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

I've redirected this to monothematic delusion, of which this syndrome seems to be a recently discovered example. If it should happen to feature prominently in the medical literature (which frankly seems rather unlikely given the recent provenance) then something about it should be merged in from this article. --TS 20:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have altered the redirect so it now points to Climate change denial, which is fitting. Wikispan (talk) 22:42, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

If it's going to have a redirect, wouldn't climate change exaggeration be more appropriate? Grundle2600 (talk) 00:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Seeing as the article is about an alleged medical syndrome, the redirection to monothematic delusion sounds best to me. But you'll eventually have to find more basis for it than the opinion of one doctor. PhGustaf (talk) 00:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

There is no such medical syndrome named "Climate change delusion". It is complete fiction. Wikispan (talk) 08:27, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic