Talk:Clifford Menhennitt

Deleted repetitive points edit

Firstly, the fact that Menhennit is not well known today is mentioned in the introduction; repeating this in the conclusion of the article is unnecessary.

Secondly, mention of Young CJ's tribute to Menhennit J at the Supreme Court's special sitting--which, it has been made clear, was in his honour--does not add to the article in my view. A quotation of his tribute might add to it, by contrast.