 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Semi-protected edit request on 30 March 2015 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add "And them's the facts!" to the end of the article to clarify that the article is over. 128.237.195.188 (talk) 19:44, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Not done: What ? Mlpearc (open channel) 20:10, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- The vandalism is inspired by this ClickHole article, if you were wondering. Pbtflakes (talk) 21:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
"Controversy" edit
I don't want to run afoul of any Wikipedia policy on what constitutes "controversy," but is what currently exists in the "Controversy" section really that? I don't think people being confused about relatively obvious satire is all that controversial. Nor is the quasi-philosophical question as to whether ClickHole is "clickbait parody" or "parody-as-clickbait." Efyeahimamarxist (talk) 15:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- It took a while but since the Controversy section did not contain any actual controversy I merged it with the Reception section. Comments from critics, and the audience failing to understand that the site was satirical broadly fits under Reception. -- 109.78.248.150 (talk) 13:11, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
um, what? edit
"it was revealed that the ClickHole team meets frequently to brainstorm about new ideas and topics that can be written about."
Is this supposed to be some kind of Onion satire? Pretty sure every news/satire/writing organization on the planet "meets frequently to brainstorm" ... this is written like it was some great big reveal. Scrap this entire section, it's irrelevant. Nothing different than what every news/satire organization does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yellowjournalism (talk • contribs) 03:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- If you see a problem, you're encouraged to be bold and fix it. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
And them's the facts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:5B7B:1900:DC9E:F8AA:434E:731C (talk) 11:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC) and them's the fact
updates for accuracy edit
| | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, not sure if I'm doing this correctly, but I'm a representative from ClickHole, and I was hoping someone could correct some inaccuracies on our Wikipedia page. Currently, the owner is listed as Cards Against Humanity LLC, whereas ClickHole is an employee-owned independent entity legally registered as ClickHole LLC. Also, the editor-in-chief is listed as Matt Powers, who has not been employed by the website in a couple years. The current editor-in-chief is Steve Etheridge. Additionally, the staff is listed as having 30 members, when in actuality we have six full-time staff members. Most of this information can be verified by article 11 under the references section——this is the most recent and accurate reporting on the company. If you need additional verification, please contact ClickHole's editor-in-chief, who can be reached at setheridge@clickhole.com. Thanks!
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - QuadColour (talk) 01:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)