![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 March 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
edit- I just updated the Cleversafe page and updated the references to correct the notability issues. Can someone please review and let me know if the updates are adequate?
Proposed Cleversafe Edits
editMy name is Dorinne Hoss and I am a Marketing Manager at Cleversafe. I would like to update the Cleversafe page with some new information. I welcome feedback on the proposed changes.
Proposed Change to Number of Employees: 65[1]
Proposed Addition to History Section:
In 2010, Cleversafe announced an investment and development agreement with In-Q-Tel that will enable Cleversafe’s storage platform to be used in deployments supporting the United States Intelligence Community.[2]
Proposed Addition to Awards Section:
- Execullence Award for Best Disruptive Technology 2011[3]
Proposed changes to the following sections will be forthcoming:
- Products
- Open Source
--DorinneHoss (talk) 18:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- ^ "Startup Cleversafe Turning Into Prodigious Patent Producer". Crain's Chicago Business.
- ^ "Cleversafe Selected by IQT For Strategic Deployments Supporting U.S. Intelligence Community". In-Q-Tel.
- ^ "Execullence Awards". ExecEvent.
Notability Warning
editThis is Crystal from Cleversafe. I’d like to discuss the possibility of removing the notability warning atop this article. I tried to fix our references previously, but unfortunately I made some errors in following the community guidelines. I would like to rectify this mistake.
Overall, we believe that the company meets the notability guidelines. Below are some recent articles featuring Cleversafe. Can the necessity of the notability warning be re-evaluated on this basis?
Forbes
The Wall Street Journal
http://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2014/08/27/miami-marlins-adopt-new-storage-technology-for-video-age/
Information Week
Crystalgettemyjones (talk) 18:58, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Notabiility is no longer the issue. I have updated the warning templates to reflect the current issues with the article. Feel free to make the changes yourself if you can be objective and avoid WP:POV, WP:ADVERT and WP:COI.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing this. Near as I can tell, directly editing this article would be a big no-no. Also, since few folks have stopped by here, it would just look bad if the main editor of the article was no less than a company representative. Where do you recommend I go? WikiProject: Technology, maybe? Mpascual312 (talk) 14:52, 21 October 2014 (UTC)