Talk:Clevedon Court/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 12:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: two found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:57, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Found and tagged another dead link. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

I could only find one tagged deadlink - which I have fixed.— Rod ^talk 21:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Generally well written. Could the Interior section be expanded slightly. Perhaps some idea of the layout?Jezhotwells (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Done

   Expanded.— Rod ^talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

   "causing national scandal" - I think this would read better as "causing a national scandal". Jezhotwells (talk) 13:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)  Done

   Changed— Rod ^talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   ref #3 Annual Archæological Review 2001–2002" - I can find nothing there that supports "but the evidence, based on excavations to the South of the house in 1961/62, is now known to be uncertain.". Perhaps I missed it? Jezhotwells (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Done

   I've reworded this as I agree the claim is not fully supported but this seems to be the only reference to Roman remains - its not in more recent sources so I have left the word speculation.— Rod ^talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

   ref #13 "Mary Elton Primary School". - There is nothing there to confirm that the school was named after this Mary Elton. I am sure that it was named after her, but we need evidence. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Done

   New reference which states this.— Rod ^talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

   what makes The Gardening website (ref #38), TourUK (ref #24), Britain's Finest (ref #26) and AboutBritain.com (ref #39) reliable sources? Jezhotwells (talk) 15:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Done

   Removed/replaced— Rod ^talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

   {http://www.davenapier.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/mayors/history1.htm} is a personal website, not RS Jezhotwells (talk) 15:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Done

   Replaced— Rod ^talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

   same for {http://www.leighrayment.com/baronetage/baronetse.htm} Jezhotwells (talk) 15:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Done

   Replaced— Rod ^talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Broad and of suitable length, focussed. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV Jezhotwells (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   stable

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I am worried about the copyright status of File:W Phot c1950.jpg ‎ and File:W Phot c1920.jpg ‎ ands have nomitaed for deletion at commons so that a judgement can be made. Same applies to File:Clevedon Court.jpg Jezhotwells (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Well two have been deleted and the other kept so that is now satsfied. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC) Done

If necessary I can replace these with other images - however they do help with the historical perspective which isn't really provided by the other pics in the commons cat.— Rod ^talk 21:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

1. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   All good now, I am happy to promote this. Sorry about the delay before getting back to this, real life intervened. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC)