This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ColombiaWikipedia:WikiProject ColombiaTemplate:WikiProject ColombiaColombia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Are the random pictures of actors and/or places somehow related to the movie really helpful? Looks a lot like inserting some pictures just for the sake of having some pictures... -- Imladros (talk) 11:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
There are only two photographs on the entire page. And they depict the key supporting actors in the film. They are very much relevant. It's not in any way different from other film articles on Wikipedia that also include images of actors from their respective films. Baffled12 (talk) 12:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Seeing as the film holds an 80% approval rating, being generally positive, there should be greater emphasis on the positive aspects of why the film is regarded as such, seeing as the chosen sections from reviews for the film right now are all negative and critical, save for the highlighted blurb from the Washington Post article that is not even included in the actual body of general critical opinions on the film.2601:49:1:5316:3963:63AD:85B7:9C6 (talk) 04:02, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
