Talk:Clavibacter michiganensis

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Ninjatacoshell in topic Taxonomic quirks

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Clavibacter michiganensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Template or just link edit

Hi @WhatamIdoing: Can you explain this edit? Removing cite templates with bare [ ] seems negative to me. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Invasive Spices, we don't use citation templates in the ==External links== section. See Wikipedia:External links#External links section. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:01, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Taxonomic quirks edit

Hi @Ninjatacoshell: Can you explain putting quotes around the Phylum? I don't think I've ever seen that before. And unlinking the former genus names seems negative to me. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Invasive Spices: the quotes were because "Actinobacteria" was an unofficial name. Since then the phylum has been given an official name under the ICNP (Actinomycetota), which is currently in the taxobox. I unlinked the former genus names because I've never seen that done anywhere but in this article. Ninjatacoshell (talk) 06:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply