Talk:Classified information/Archives/2020
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Classification level missing
As for the classification levels, apart from "top secret", "secret", "confidential", "restricted", shouldn't there be another level called "open to the general public"? --Yejianfei (talk) 04:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Australian classification levels out of date
Australia changes its classification levels as per https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/sites/default/files/PSPF-fact-sheet-classification-reforms.pdf, to https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/information/sensitive-classified-information/Pages/default.aspx (e.g., CONFIDENTIAL no longer exists, and FOUO is now OFFICIAL: Sensitive).
maybe add LE?
there is a local/municipoal/state version in the US: law enforcement only. someone add this? Cramyourspam (talk) 02:16, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Classified information. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121030155345/http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/uss_liberty/attack_sigint.pdf to http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/uss_liberty/attack_sigint.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.uscg.mil/petaluma/e-pme/e-pme/apprentice/G-Lessons/4-G-03.pdf - Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://ssi-iss.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/questions/esp-pss-eng.html#q4 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151017171415/http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=25487§ion=text=True to http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=25487§ion=text=True
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
NATO Unclassified is different
In NATO, the word Unclassified is still a classification, according to the NATO web site, which states: "Material marked NATO UNCLASSIFIED is managed and owned by NATO. The first part, ‘NATO,’ refers to the ownership, while ‘UNCLASSIFIED’ is the level of security marking. Unclassified information should only be used for official purposes, and not be released without authorization nor published online." 61cc (talk) 19:51, 8 October 2020 (UTC)