Talk:Class (pirating group)

from Vfd

On 18 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Class (warez) for a record of the discussion.

Class on the C64

As noted by an anonymous editor, "Class" is also the name of a cracking group in 1990 for the Commodore 64, which can be confirmed by CSDb. [1] Is there any evidence that the relationship of these two groups goes beyond their name similarity? —RaD Man (talk) 00:26, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

Their first NFO seems to say no to that question. [2] --Ipggi 03:53, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

UHA not ACE

the compression metods used by class is much more complex than simplily put a archive in a .ACE archive with right mouse button they disassemble the sound and compress it with an copressor designed to sound use UHARC to copress the remainder and after this divide in several ACE copressed parts and oftentimes create their own installers.

the same compression is used by TECHNIC.

Image

I'm addin an image of crackto intro... ITS NOT WAREZ OR PIRATE MATERIAL! Just an intro, with 3D animation and stuff, itn't not an installer... Does nothing, only shows graphic and music (chiptunes). --R2cyberpunk 03:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Class endtro demo.PNG

Image:Class endtro demo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Anyway i'm sure Moonlord didn't copyright this endtro, but who cares... I won't add image again. --R2cyberpunk (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

---

CLASS (warez) → Class (warez) – Firstly, proper disambiguation is "warez group" (entity that pirates), not "warez" (actual pirated material). Secondly, per MOS:TM and WP:TITLE, we don't stylize "Paradox" unless exclusively known by that stylization. However, I realize this is borderline WP:COMMONNAME, so taking to requested moves instead of moving myself. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 12:08, 15 August 2011 (UTC) See also: Talk:PARADOX (warez)#Requested move

The move looks reasonable to me. bobrayner (talk) 20:04, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Updated to Class (warez) per one of two WP:NCDAB alternatives which is closer to Category:Warez groups. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 08:12, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

• Support per WP:ALLCAPS and MOS:TM. Jenks24 (talk) 09:26, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Class (warez). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041204171752/http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/AshcroftRemarks042204.htm to http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/AshcroftRemarks042204.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC)