Talk:Civil Police (Brazil)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Bryard in topic Untitled

Expert Criminal or Criminal Expert?

edit

or perhaps even Expert Criminalist? --TiagoTiago (talk) 01:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

In my humble opinion, Expert Criminalist is correct.nothing more, nothing less --Bryard 19:37, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Untitled

edit

THIS ARTICLE IS SO BADLY WRITTEN IN ENGLISH. I SPEAK ITALIAN, PORTUGUESE AND FRENCH...EVEN IF I TRY TO UNDERSTAND LATIN LOGIC SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THIS ENTRY ARE INCOMPREHENSIBLE IN ENGLISH...CAN SOMEONE PLEASE FIX IT... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.56.111.157 (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Why are you written that in capital letters? Are U try to scream with us ? And by the way, are U a law enforcement agent ? Are U ? Are ? Well, in a comunication between two parts, it is demanded to be polited. This is the paramount rule of Netquet.


  In any case, I will try to work in the quality of the article. Thanks bring the queston to our attention.


  By the way: on the next time, thy to mascarade your IP protocol. I know you're in Milan, Italy. 


  XD





Bryard (talk) 12:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Civil Police (Brazil). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply