Talk:City of Norwood v. Horney

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Untitled

edit

I am thinking about editing this article to reflect the procedural posture, the issue before the court, exactly what the two sides were arguing, and the grounds on which the Ohio Supreme Court found for the homeowners. I think that because this was the first case involving a state supreme court's interpretation of the 'public use' clause and whether eminent domain can be used for private development after the US Supreme Court Kelo case, this information should be included in the article. Any thoughts? Lawiggin 12:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Definitely- the fact that this was the first post-Kelo ruling is its strongest argument for notability. 4.229.219.206 04:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Note: The links to the cases are not working. Not sure if you can still link directly to a case.Memargolis (talk) 18:26, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on City of Norwood v. Horney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply