Talk:Citizens for Civil Discourse

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merger

edit

The Citizens for Civil Discourse is an organization that has the broad goal and mission of elevating political discourse in America. Their current project, the website: Stop Political Calls is one way to do that, by presently gathering requests to block robocalls. The organization and the site are two distinct entities, but not the same, thus they require separate definitions.

Even if they were the same thing, which they are not, they should still have separate WP entries, just as the the Executive Branch of Government is related to WhiteHouse.gov -- they are not the same thing and thus should have separate entries.

See the uncontested entries for:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitehouse.gov -and- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_house

And even:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_branch

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.42.85.150 (talkcontribs) 15:57, October 28, 2008

This situation is not remotely comparable to those you've listed above. The two stub articles in question (Citizens for Civil Discourse and Stop Political Calls) are basically the same identical. I have merged them redirecting the website stub to this one. --Dual Freq (talk) 03:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Citizens for Civil Discourse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 25 November 2016 (UTC)Reply