Talk:Circuit identification code

Latest comment: 6 years ago by TadgStirkland401 in topic Request Merge with Circuit ID article

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 10:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply


Circuit identification code -> Circuit Identification Code

Per WP:CAPS and WP:TITLE: this is a proper noun referring to a single specific field in a single standard. It does not refer to a general identification code for circuits. — Dgtsyb (talk) 22:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose. This is not a proper name. There is not one single code called "Circuit Identification Code", but many. See a Googlebooks search on "circuit identification codes".
Neither WP:CAPS nor WP:TITLE gives support to this RM.
NoeticaTea? 00:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Request Merge with Circuit ID article

edit

The mainspace article, Circuit ID, is much longer and much more detailed. I'd recommend merging the two and developing redirects. --TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 12:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply