Refs?

edit

Let's "reference" it as much as possible ;) Iulius 16:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's hard because each statement usually has several sources ... :-( --Lysytalk 18:25, 27 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
reference only doubtful of them Iulius 18:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
What is doubtful ? I don't know. --Lysytalk 18:46, 27 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
i don't know either Iulius 09:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hic Jacet Pecator

edit

Iulius, why did you remove "Hic Jacet Pecator" with the comment "no such text" ? the text is even clearly visible in the photo if you magnify it. It's exactly where there stone is broken (supposedly due to a lightning). --Lysytalk 08:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

i'm sorry if i'm blind Iulius 09:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
The photo is high resolution, try to enlarge it to full screen and then read the inscription just where the crack is in the upper part of the tablet, just above the word "PAC". I have really no problems reading it. --Lysytalk 09:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

this should help M.K. 09:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Change of the name

edit

I propose to change the name of the article slightly to "St. Peter and St. Paul's Church, Vilnius", to be closer to generally accepted conventions.Iulius 05:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead. --Lysytalk 06:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Chapel of Polish Queens

edit

There used to be the Chapel of Polish Queens to the left, near to the entrance. After Vilnius returned to Lithuania, it was changed into simply the Chapel of Queens. Does anyone know when and why was it renamed. Well, I can imagine why, but more details would be interesting. Was the inscription in the arch of the ceiling changed during some recent renovation or was it earlier ? --Lysytalk 15:23, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

The founder's tablet

edit

The founder's tombstone picture is interesting because while not of particular artistic value, it has a story to it (I'm sure you know it). Now, people will read a story and be able to see how the stone looks like. This seems more interesting than just another shot of the dome. If you'd like to see more pictures of interior details, I have a number of such shots, but they would overcrowd the article, and I think the diversity of images is what makes their illustration value and the whole article more interesting. --Lysytalk 16:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

howewer this image is unfotogenic at all: little use of it tumbnailed. So it best to be edited or presented some other way. Iulius 17:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
You are right. It should be presented some other way, maybe as an external link ? --Lysytalk 17:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Done. --Lysytalk 09:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Michał Kazimierz Pac

edit

My last edit concerning the funding of the construction of the church is of a copy-editing nature. Not so sure that there actually was a "victory" over the Russians in the 17th century war referred to. Ditto to the Lubomirski Rokosz being a contributing factor in Pac's benevolence. Any takers, or better yet references to the assertion? Dr. Dan (talk) 05:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Church of St. Peter and St. Paul, Vilnius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:20, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:St. Peter and St. Paul's Church 2, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg scheduled for POTD

edit

Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture File:St. Peter and St. Paul's Church 2, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 29, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-06-29. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The Church of St. Peter and St. Paul is a Roman Catholic church located in the Antakalnis neighbourhood of Vilnius, Lithuania. Constructed between 1668 and 1701, it is the centerpiece of a former monastery complex of the Canons Regular of the Lateran. The church is considered a masterpiece of Baroque architecture in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. This picture shows the central nave of the church, looking south-westwards towards the entrance. The nave is dominated by plain white walls that contrast with opulent decorations elsewhere in the church. It is decorated with colorful depictions of the Stations of the Cross and evenly spaced sculptures of the Twelve Apostles, as well as a number of torture scenes placed within niches featuring martyrs from the persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire. The pulpit, designed in the Rococo style, can be seen on the right of the photograph, while the pipe organ is visible above the entrance in the background.

Photograph credit: David Iliff