Talk:Church Avenue station (IND Culver Line)/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by The Rambling Man in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 10:55, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


Comments

  • Lead is inadequate, it should cover some of the history of the line and perhaps even some of the pertinent points of the layout.
    • I added information from the history section. What do you think is pertinent in the layout section?--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Where is the street address of the station referenced?
    • In the exits section, where it says Outside fare control, there is a token booth and staircases going up to all four corners of Church and McDonald Avenues.
  • " Line.[4][6][5] " order.
  • Curiously, Kensington is not mentioned in the main part of the article at all, just the lead and infobox.
  • Link Ditmas Ave station first time round.
  • expected expected - a bit repetitive.
  • "On October 30, 1954,[17][18] " any need for two refs?
  • "local service.[24][7]" order.
  • " station.[24][7][25][26]" likewise.
  • "passenger complaints" about what?
  • What is MTA?
  • "New Zealand athlete Jack Lovelock" somewhat understating, he was a 1936 Olympic gold medallist!
  • Don't overlink Ditmas.

That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 16:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@The Rambling Man: Thanks for taking this up. I have addressed some of these and will get to the remainder of the issues already noted.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
The Zip code isn't referenced anywhere, but it's not a dealbreaker. If you could do that it'd be great. But I'm passing the article in any case. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 10:44, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.