Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Oshaffer.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Is there a problem?

edit

Russian Federation needs to be capitalized, in case someone was confused. Kazak 03:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What is the source for the phonology section, in particular the vowel harmony part? The article could use footnotes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.84.176.186 (talk) 06:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The history of the Chukchi people needs to be explored in greater depth. At the moment, there is only a scope section that briefly touches on the subject. There is also no discussion of any Chukchi dialects or related languages. Oshaffer (talk) 17:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Olivia ShafferReply

Discrepancies in number of speakers

edit

Chukchi people article states that there are 15 000 Chukchi; this article says there are 10 000 speakers. Which one is wrong? Or does not every Chukcha speak Chukchi language?.. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alexander Iwaschkin (talkcontribs) 14:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

You're correct: not all Chukchi people speak Chukchi. While 15000 is about the right figure for the number of people registered as ethnic Chukchis, I suspect that 10000 speakers is wildly optimistic. But I'm not aware of any accurate count. The census figures overestimate too, since the question about native language can also be interpreted to mean "what is the language of your ethnic group". Ngio 20:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have a book here called Languages of the World from 2002 that gives 12,000 speakers for the language. Shall we change it to that? Here's the page on Chukchi for future reference:
Chukchi is spoken in northeasternmost Siberia, principally in the Chukchi National District, whose capital is Anadyr. With only 12,000 speakers, it is nonetheless the most important member of the Paleo-Asiatic family of languages. Chukchi is written in the Cyrillic alphabet with the additional letters (these are already in the article so I won't bother trying to find them). A curious feature of the language is that the letter k is pronounced k by men but ts by women, while the combination rk is pronounced rk by men but tsts by women. Thus thu Chukchi word for "walrus" is pronounced kyrky by men but tsytstsy by women.
Mithridates 16:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
OK, the Russian census is online (see especially tables 4-3 and 4-4), available in English as spreadsheets. I've fixed the numbers.
The issue of overestimation of the number of speakers still stands. The wording of the question is pretty clear, but e.g. in the case of Kerek language it reports 15 speakers, whereas Kerek is almost certainly extinct (and was nearly extinct in 2002 as well). I suspect that people are exaggerating their language abilities to support their ethnic group. -- Ngio 06:27, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Translation from ru:

edit

I've created a new section by translating section Распространённость from ru:Чукотский язык, as per this request. Note that a single source of contradiction may have been introduced: whereas the en: article, prior to this addition, used to claim that less than half Chukchis speak their own language, the ru: version claims to contrary. If you know for sure the en: version is correct, feel free to revert the appropriate phrases. I'm not an expert on this subject at all, nor have any opinion, but have merely translated the ru: info. IgorSF 08:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Upon a further inspection, it seems that the en: version referred to a more recent census, which can explain the difference. I've self-reverted the specific part claiming otherwise. IgorSF 08:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

In addition, I've translated the Внешнее влияние section, which included a bit of linguistic terms, some of which may be improper due to literal translation from Russian. Not being a linguist, I wouldn't know, so if you are, feel free to correct :) IgorSF 09:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Russian version seems to be a bit strange in places, if I'm reading it correctly. For instance, the writing system part that I've been working on claims that Tenevil was the author of the pictographs found whereas I was taught that the pictographs were much older than Tenevil and that Tenevil made the first attempts to create a writing system for Chukchi as we know it today. I've left thus all mention of that out of the translation until I find some sources to back it up one way or another. Thanks by the way for translating this, too :) -Yupik 19:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
On the basis of an ancient Soviet popular science magazine I once came across in a sack intended for toilet paper (!?) I believe that Tenevil was the creator of the pictographs. There were some samples of these pictographs with notional translations, but on the basis of these I doubted very much that the pictographs were an encoding of language in such a way that other people familiar with the system would be able to decode them reliably, or at all... Furthermore it has never been claimed that the pictographs were known outside Tenevil's immediate family. I think they're really a just a curiosity like a hobbyist's constructed language, and I would suggest omitting any mention of them at all. -- Ngio 14:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cyrillic El with Hook

edit
  • In the text it is claimed that this letter dates from the late 1980s. Is there any documentation of that? I was under the impression it was first used in Emel'janova and Nutekeu's 1996 textbook (the one I've just added an image from).
  • Since the "El With Hook" characters are so new in unicode, I doubt they are rendered on most people's computers. I saw somebody was experimenting with adding images, but apparently gave up. Should we worry about this, or should we just wait for unicode fonts to catch up with us?
-- Ngio 14:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

By the way, there's a mistake in language name in Chukchi. The right one is Ԓыгъоравэтԓьэн йиԓыйиԓ--V. (talk) 14:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Primer

edit

Hi,

I was very pleased to see the image of the Chukchi textbook here. I absolutely love textbooks printed in Russia: they just say the name of the subject and the grade number on the cover and they are uniform in all schools. (At least that's the way it was in the Soviet times, when i was a schoolboy in Moscow.)

Anyway, I see that it's for the fifth grade. This is a little weird - i would expect that a primer would be used in the first grade. In Russian-language schools the first alphabet-learning book is called Букварь, and grammar textbooks for students that already learned the letters are called Русский язык X (Russian language X, where X is the grade number) all the way to graduation.

Now this book is called "Chukchi language 5" (in Chukchi). It can mean two things:

  1. Chukchi schools mostly teach in Russian and Chukchi language lessons begin only in the fifth grade - which probably also means that Chukchi children hardly learn it at all.
  2. This book is not a primer, in which case the title of the image should be fixed.

It would be great if anyone could clarify this. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 15:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

As you note, it's not called a primer or anything else on the book itself. Textbook is probably a better description. I'll change it here now, and then I'll change the name of the image once I work out how. I'm glad you enjoyed the image: A Soviet-style Chukchi textbook is a pretty cool artifact! -- Ngio (talk) 15:54, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks!
Do you know whether there are books for earlier grades? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 16:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
There are, but they'd be pretty old. They're almost certainly published by the Prosveshchenie publisher in Leningrad/St Peterburg. You might find copies in the Lenin Library if you're in (or have contacts in) Moscow. -- Ngio (talk) 19:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chukchi language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chukchi language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chukchi language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply