Talk:Chuck Versus Agent X/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Boycool42 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 01:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit
  • The talkpage needs Wikiprojects
    • Done.
  • The plot section is largely confusing to me (a non-Chuck watcher). Not sure if this can be fixed enough for non-viewers to comprehend, but I recommend giving it a slight rewrite
    • The episode itself was largely confusing, even for a hardcore viewer like me, but the summary is not quite chronological, especially in the first few paragraphs. It's only 372 or so words, so I'll work on it later.
      • I edited the plot and I think it's just about as detailed as it can get to be clear to non-Chuck viewers without going over on detail (or word count).
  • In the lead you say a character "makes a life-changing discovery" from a laptop, but the plot is unclear on this (it just says "spy will")
    • I tweaked the plot summary in the lead, because it wasn't true to the episode's actual plot.
  • Indicate Jeffster! is a band
    • Done
  • Too many "also"s and "revealed"s in production
    • I removed an "also" and changed a few "revealed"s. Tell me if there are still too many.
  • I recommend combining music and cultural ref sections (combine under "Music and cultural references" heading)
    • Done.
  • Websites are not italicize (i.e. TV by the Numbers (add wikilink also)). Also, Den of Geek is three words.
    • Done.
  • Sentences ending in quotes need a citation directly after period (mostly in reception section)
    • Done.
  • Ref 9 needs accessdate
    • Done; I was missing a bit of code in the ref.
  • Either italicize all Chucks and other TV shows in ref titles, or none of them
    • The only "Chuck"s italicized are the ones that were italicized in the titles of the original websites.
  • I recommend still italicizing all of them for consistency's sake (see Lost episodes for examples, if needed) Ruby2010 comment! 15:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'll place the review on hold for seven days while everything gets sorted. Please reply here when your edits are finished, as I will not be watching the article page. Thanks and good luck, Ruby2010 comment! 02:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Looks great! Pass for GA. Nice work, Ruby2010 comment! 03:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks you very much! --Boycool (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply