| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Protection edit
I suggest that protection is added to this page because of griefing. 65.188.249.211 (talk) 21:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Contested deletion edit
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is a noteworthy internet meme, already referenced on other pages, with enough information to warrant its own article. --Kaz (talk) 18:09, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Contested deletion edit
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <This is a legitimate topic for a Wikipedia page, I included links to the author's page, and I have proof that the page IS a real meme, it is included in Know Your Meme, We Know Memes (website), and has gotten over 10,000,000 hits on YouTube>. — Corwin Karl (talk) 18:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not sure if an admin is available to restore the history from the previously deleted version, there's a better sourced, better version in there. Thargor Orlando (talk) 21:32, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Preserving Wildlife edit
Is this really the best way to describe taxidermy? because stuffing dead animals doesn't really smack of "preserving wildlife". Surely preserving wildlife would be not killing rhinos (There's a rhino in the ad) in the first place.