Talk:Christopher Dorner

(Redirected from Talk:Christopher Jordan Dorner)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Cyphoidbomb in topic Christopher Dorner - A Last Stand

References

edit

June 2013 report by LAPD re Dorner firing

edit

LAPD: Firing of Christopher Dorner 'sound and just' CNN
Police Commission questions why Christopher Dorner was ever hired by LAPD Southern California Public Radio
LAPD's firing of Christopher Dorner was justified, report says LA Times
--Bob K31416 (talk) 01:49, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Edit request on 9 October 2013

edit

Please change "Two weeks later, Evans gave Dorner a performance review that stated he needed to improve in three areas" to "Two weeks later, Evans gave Dorner a performance review that stated she needed to improve in three areas." Mloojm (talk) 03:37, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Not done Dorner is male. --NeilN talk to me 03:46, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Christopher Dorner - A Last Stand

edit

With regard to this edit, where IP 121.214.57.181 added content to the article about a 4chan video game mod based on Dorner, I have removed it for not being noteworthy. Doesn't improve our understanding of the subject, and if we were to include every 4chan "project" that got some attention, we'd have many more crappy articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:48, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

An appreciated note, @Arxiloxos:. The content submitted seems to be copypasta from one of many sources (Google search), so that's somewhat problematic. I'll gladly yield if other community members feel a modified version of this content is warranted. I will note that the 4chan Doom 3 mod content contains racist overtones, ("Nigga Nigga Nigga" song, buckets of KFC fried chicken as power-ups, etc.) Though we do not censor, I'm not sure what the encyclopedic value is of including this information since it does not improve our understanding of Dorner or of his motivations for violence. It seems to parody them, if anything. Some news agencies picked up on the sensationalist content, and that's fine, but that doesn't automatically warrant inclusion. Anyhow, I do appreciate the note and the extra sources, Arx, and I await other feedback. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:01, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply