Talk:Christopher Bakken

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

wp:notlink: "There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia." Pohick2 (talk) 20:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit
You really think this article needs links to the subjects personal webpage, twitter account, and blog? Jminthorne (talk) 20:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
actually this is the first poet i've found with a twitter, which i thought worthy of a link. for reporters, these links are commonplace. however to guard against self promotion, they go down in the links, for the interested reader who wants more info. the idea that any twitter or blog link is promotion is nonsense Pohick2 (talk) 20:34, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christopher Bakken. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)Reply