Talk:Christian Community Bible

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Anruari in topic Controversial Editions

Table of Old Testament Books

edit

I've created a section with a table that shows the differences between the Christian Community Bible, the Catholic, and Jewish orderings of the books in the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible. I am not sure what Wikipedia's footnote style is, so if anyone could correct my reference to the 17th Edition's Introduction I would greatly appreciate it.Fralupo (talk) 02:51, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Website working?

edit

Website doesn't seem to work for me, but shows up on Google, so maybe just a temp. problem Wegsjac 16:29, 1 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

P/E and R/E editions

edit

I was wondering what the R/E edition is.

From what I saw on the web page the P/E is the Pastoral Edition.

Does anybody know what the R/E is?

Philip

Partial copvio

edit

THis article is in large part a copyvio from http://www.bible.claret.org/bibles/bmain.htm. -- Avocado 19:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

If anyone decides to delete this page for copyvio, please first split the Chinese section (with the "Online versions" and "References" sections) into its own article. Thank you.—Gniw (Wing) 14:15, 27 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
I have split the article myself—Gniw (Wing) 05:35, 28 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Controversial Editions

edit

This section cites no references. For such an important section casting doubt on the credentials of a major bible translation the author should cite sources.

Continued controversy regarding the French translation: Replacement Theology is a central tenant of Catholic Theology. This is a Catholic translation of the bible. Without replacement theology Catholicism would have no sacraments. Therefore why is this comment relevant? - Of course observant Jews are not going to like being told by Christians that Christianity fulfils the promises of the old testament, and that the new covenant fulfils and super-cedes the Old Covenant. In the same way the Christians total reject the authenticity of the Aprophrical Gospels which suggest that Jesus was only a man and not divine, while the Muslims accept some of these as proof that Jesus was a Prophet who foretold the coming of Mohammed. Such comments have a place, but not on this page which is specifically about a particular translation. Anruari (talk) 09:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)Reply