Talk:Chris Candido Memorial Tag Team Tournament/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs) 16:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC) I'll take this one. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC) Good Article Checklist

• Well-written -the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
• Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and it contains no original research.
• Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
• Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
• Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
• Illustrated, if possible, by images: images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• Disambig links: OK
• Reference check:OK

Comments: This article has a few issues.

• "The tournament was well received overall." - you mean "well-received"
  • Fixed
• Dates August 16, 2005 – August 16, 2005 - Only needs one date. Please fix.
  • Due to template, it requires a start and finish date. I'd have to leave one off and not sure how that would work.
• TNA editor Bill Banks' in his "Bank Shot" column - why do we need the name of his column?
  • Fixed
• "onImpact!" spacing
  • From the copy and paste, fixed.
• " Sabin left the ring after this due to an injury." Please expand and note that this was not scripted - given the nature of the event these sorts of things need to be highlighted and have some form of announcement to prevent confusion.
  • Fixed
• "Chris Sabin received a broken jaw as a result of a kick from Shelley during the final round." - Choppy sentences and prose.
  • Fixed
• "He suffered a back injury, but ended up appearing at the PWG show that Sabin was forced to miss." - Intentional, scripted, cite please. (even if it is right below)
  • Fixed
• "Sean Waltman (pictured) missed TNA's Unbreakable pay-per-viewevent." and its image are not really relevant to this article. Please remove it.
  • I disagree. Waltman won the tournament and the whole tournament was to honor Candido and to become number-one contender to the tag team titles technically. Waltman missed the match he won. I think it is very relevant.
• "TNA management were very upset with Sean Waltman after he failed to participate in the Four Way Elimination Tag Team match. This was due to him being one-half of the winners of the Chris Candido Memorial Tag Team Tournament.[21]Waltman was in Orlando and was dressed to compete, but did not arrive in time to participate in his match.[22] He was not used again by TNA until January 15, 2006 when he appeared at their Final Resolution PPV event.[23]" - Is copied text from the other article. Please fix the prose. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:28, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Actually, this is the original as I wrote this one first. I wrote Unbreakable and this at the same time. Re-done.

Several issues holding this back. Otherwise, not too bad. Please fix it and I should be able to pass it. Placing it on hold now. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:28, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, I hope I have fixed the issues.--WillC 18:25, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Passed. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)