Talk:Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1996

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 196.21.80.2 in topic What

Proposed merger with "Abortion in South Africa" edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I propose that Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1996 be merged into Abortion in South Africa. My reasons are:

  • Issue about abortion in other countries are usually dealt with in the "Abortion in [country]" articles.
  • The content of the act article is essentially a duplicate of content already present in the abortion article.
  • The article about the act was written after the article on abortion.
  • The abortion article is not too big for the merger (and will not swell by much since most of the content is duplicated content). leuce (talk) 07:44, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Oppose: this article is already detailed (if this was a stub you might have a case) and it discusses a specific act of Parliament. I see no reason to merge the article on a law with the topic the act legislates on. -- Hazhk Talk to me 00:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1996. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:44, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

What is the purpose of act edit

What is the purpose of act 196.21.80.2 (talk) 17:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

What edit

What is the purpose of act meaning behind an act 196.21.80.2 (talk) 17:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply