Talk:Choco pie
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
|
|
Requested move 1 November 2015 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 08:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Choco Pie → Choco pie – Since this not a proper noun, I recommend changing the name of this article from Choco Pie to Choco pie. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 10:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support per nom. — AjaxSmack 00:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Well, but wait.There is no such English word as "choco" AFAIK. Either there is a thing called a "Choco Pie" and that is its proper name, or we have...I don't know, "chocolate pie" I guess. Looking at the article, it appears that there are two things being talked about here: some actual products with an actual proper brand name of "Choco Pie", and some other things -- moon pies (or Moon Pies) and so on. It's possible that "choco pie" is now a genericized term, but I'm not sure of this. I would recommend at least considering leaving the name alone, or changing it to "Chocolate pie", although the OP's suggestion might be OK if this really is a genericized brand name... Herostratus (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- I would support keeping as is if a singular brand name, but I do not believe it is. This name of a product seems similar to Moon pie, where there are several companies that make them. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 01:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- User:Herostratus: scotcheroos, bossche bolen and honmei choco are not English words either but they are still not proper nouns. Read the article; it tells exactly how the name choco pie became genericized. — AjaxSmack 06:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- OK. This seems right. User:AjaxSmack makes a cogent point re the word "choco". The difficult thing for me is that it's not a word in an English-speaking country. I did not know that Korean used an alphabet, though. It's not entirely clear to me that I could make and market "Herostratus's choco pies" here in the USA, I guess... Korean intellectual property rights apply here by treaty (I think) but Korean court rules re what is and is not intellectual property are not binding or even necesarily considered in our courts (I think)... but OK. Herostratus (talk) 07:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- User:Herostratus: scotcheroos, bossche bolen and honmei choco are not English words either but they are still not proper nouns. Read the article; it tells exactly how the name choco pie became genericized. — AjaxSmack 06:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- I would support keeping as is if a singular brand name, but I do not believe it is. This name of a product seems similar to Moon pie, where there are several companies that make them. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 01:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support per all of above. N.B.: Article text needs to be rewritten to match title after and if the move is made. Herostratus (talk) 07:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Choco pie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711020145/http://members.forbes.com/global/2006/0227/026A.html to http://members.forbes.com/global/2006/0227/026A.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
"Chocolate pie" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Chocolate pie and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 10#Chocolate pie until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 16:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)