Talk:Cho Min academic credentials scandal

Latest comment: 1 year ago by BilledMammal in topic Requested move 12 March 2023

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 12 March 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus against moving; no consensus on whether the topic is notable enough for a standalone article, and editors interested in exploring that topic are encouraged to open a merge request or an AfD. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


Cho Min academic credentials scandalCho Min – This article already is written like a WP:BLP, and it would be more helpful to treat it as such. Holidayruin (talk) 05:38, 12 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 17:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Merge article into Cho Kuk. This individual (and her academic scandal) is not significant enough to have a separate article. 〜Festucalextalkcontribs 16:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose rename and oppose merge. She is notable only for the credentials scandal, and therefore the article should not be written like a WP:BLP or be renamed to Cho Min. The Early years and Research in genetics and other academic achievements sections should be removed and they are undercited/lack any citations. However, the scandal itself is absolutely significant enough to warrant a separate article, and the scandal played an important role in the resignation of Cho Kuk, and the defeat of Moon Jae-in's Democratic Party, and the rise of Yoon Suk-yeol. :3 F4U (talk) 13:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Chung Yoo-ra has her own article. As does Hwang Woo-suk and people like Valerie Plame. The list List of scientific misconduct incidents appears to generally list them by the person's name.
This article is already tagged as a BLP. My suggestion may be to make a separate article about the all scandals that occurred in 2019, such as Resignation of Cho Kuk or 2019 Cho Kuk scandals. Holidayruin (talk) 01:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Chung and Hwang meet Wikipedia guidelines on notability for things outside of their individual scandals and have their own articles. Cho is not. See WP:CRIME for guidelines on this. The article being tagged with the BLP policy has nothing to do with whether or not it should be written like a biography. BLP applies to all articles where the subject matter includes living persons. :3 F4U (they/it) 23:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Actually found a policy covering exactly what I'm talking about here, see WP:BIO1E. :3 F4U (they/it) 01:40, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.