Talk:Chlorobenzene

Chemicals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Safety edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

How does this have a level 3 NFPA rating and an LD of 2.9g per kilo? That's almost identical to table salt, at 3g per kilo.

Some extension of on the effects of exposure might help explain this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.149.157.19 (talk) 06:10, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Merge safety and toxicology? edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

These two sub-headings seem to be talking about the same thing - wouldn't it make sense to merge them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.154.60.112 (talk) 18:44, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

2-Chlorobenzene edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

My chemistry is a bit rusty but 2-Chlorobenzene doesn't make much sense. With one chlorine atom surely 1, 2 ,3 and 4-Chlorobenzene are all the same substance, Chlorobenzene? — Preceding unsigned comment added by IanBrock (talk • contribs) 14:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that appears to be a typo. I have now fixed it. Thanks for catching the error and reporting it here. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:54, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic